The monetary costs of pediatric upper urinary tract stone disease: Analysis in a contemporary United States cohort

The prevalence of upper urinary tract stone disease (USD) in the United States is rising among both adults and children. Studies on the contemporary economic burden of USD management in the pediatric population are lacking. To comprehensively analyze the economic impact of USD in a contemporary Unit...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of pediatric urology Vol. 18; no. 3; pp. 311 - 311.e8
Main Authors Sturgis, Morgan R., Becerra, Adan Z., Khusid, Johnathan A., Fink, Lauren E., Roadman, Daniel F., Ross, Jonathan H., Gupta, Mantu, Konety, Badrinath R., Olweny, Ephrem O.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Elsevier Ltd 01.06.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The prevalence of upper urinary tract stone disease (USD) in the United States is rising among both adults and children. Studies on the contemporary economic burden of USD management in the pediatric population are lacking. To comprehensively analyze the economic impact of USD in a contemporary United States pediatric cohort, and to evaluate drivers of cost. A retrospective cohort study of pediatric patients (aged 0–17), diagnosed with USD between 2011 and 2018 were identified from PearlDiver-Mariner, an all-payer claims database containing diagnostic, treatment and prescription data provided in all treatment settings. Relevant International Classification of Disease (ICD-9 and ICD-10) and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes were used for identification, and only patients with claims recorded for at least one year before and after entry of a diagnosis code for USD were selected (N = 10,045). Patients were stratified into those undergoing operative vs. non-operative management and for each patient, total 1-year healthcare costs following USD diagnosis, including same day and non-same day encounters, were analyzed. Factors associated with increased spending, as well as economic trends were analyzed. Overall, 8498 (85%) patients were managed non-operatively, while 1547 (15%) underwent a total of 1880 procedural interventions. Total overall cost was $117.1 million, while median annual expenditure was $15.8 million. Proportion of spending for outpatient, inpatient and prescription services was 52%, 32% and 16%, respectively (Table). Outpatient management accounted for 67% of overall spending. The proportion of patients managed non-operatively increased significantly over time, in parallel with spending for non-operative care. Comorbidity burden, treatment year and geographic region were among predictors of costs. Our study is the first to report actual insurance reimbursements for pediatric USD management using actual reimbursement data, examined across all treatment settings. We found that majority of the costs were for outpatient services and for non-operative management, with a rising tendency toward non-operative management over time. Regional variation in expenditures was evident. Specific reasons underlying these observed patterns could not directly be discerned from our dataset, but merit further investigation. Non-operative and outpatient management for pediatric USD are increasingly common, resulting in parallel shifts in spending. Notably, 52% of overall spending was for outpatient care. These insights into the contemporary economic burden of pediatric USD could provide value in shaping future healthcare policy.Summary TableOverall costs by treatment modality and setting, 2011–2018 (Millions).Summary TableURS n = 925SWL n = 294PCNL n = 58Lap/open/robotic n = 33Ancillary procedures n = 570No surgery n = 8498Total cost $117.1$15.67$2.86$2.55$1.83$15.48$78.71Inpatient $38.0$6.03$0.74$1.23$0.94$8.15$20.95Rx∗ $18.73$2.01$0.31$0.28$0.36$1.63$14.14Outpatient $60.3$7.62$1.80$1.04$0.53$5.69$43.62∗Rx = prescription.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1477-5131
1873-4898
DOI:10.1016/j.jpurol.2022.02.019