Binocular vision in infancy: Responsiveness to uncrossed horizontal disparity

•The study explored the onset of sensitivity to uncrossed horizontal disparity.•Infants 6–20 weeks of age were followed longitudinally.•Looking times and forced-choice preferential looking were observed.•The infants responded to the critical target from 13 weeks of age onward. This research explored...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInfant behavior & development Vol. 44; pp. 219 - 226
Main Authors Kavšek, Michael, Braun, Stephanie K.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.08.2016
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•The study explored the onset of sensitivity to uncrossed horizontal disparity.•Infants 6–20 weeks of age were followed longitudinally.•Looking times and forced-choice preferential looking were observed.•The infants responded to the critical target from 13 weeks of age onward. This research explored the onset of stereopsis, the ability to perceive depth from the different views provided by the two eyes. In a longitudinal study, infants were tested weekly from 6 to 20 weeks of age. The primary goal of the study was to establish the onset and the early development of sensitivity to uncrossed horizontal disparity. The infant participants were shown dynamic random dot stereograms displaying two squares, one with uncrossed horizontal disparity (0.5°) and one with vertical disparity (0.5°). The stimuli were presented on an autostereoscopic monitor. We used two methods, the forced-choice preferential looking (FPL) method and the classical natural preference (CNP) method, to measure whether the infants preferred the uncrossed over the vertical disparity display. According to the FPL data, the mean relative preferences for horizontal over vertical disparity were significantly greater than chance probability (0.50) from 13 weeks of age onward. With the CNP method we found significant preferences for uncrossed horizontal disparity from 15 weeks onward. The FPL method was hence more sensitive than the CNP method as it indicated an earlier onset of responsiveness to stereoscopic information.
ISSN:0163-6383
1879-0453
1934-8800
DOI:10.1016/j.infbeh.2016.07.001