Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on time limit and ratings of perceived exertion in physically active women

• Published in: Neuroscience letters Vol. 662; pp. 12 - 16
• Main Authors: Lattari, Eduardo, de Oliveira, Bruno Soares, Oliveira, Bruno Ribeiro Ramalho, de Mello Pedreiro, Rodrigo Cunha, Machado, Sérgio, Neto, Geraldo Albuquerque Maranhão
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Ireland Elsevier B.V 01.01.2018
• Subjects: Adult; Athletic Performance; Female; Humans; Non-invasive brain stimulation; Perception; Physical Exertion; Random Allocation; Ratings of perceived exertion; Time Factors; Time limit; Time to exhaustion; Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation; Young Adult; Non-invasive brain stimulation; Time to exhaustion; Ratings of perceived exertion; Transcranial direct current stimulation; Time limit
• ISSN: 0304-3940; 1872-7972
• DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2017.10.007

•tDCS is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique used to stimulate the cerebral cortex.•Anodal-tDCS does not improve ratings of perceived exertion in physically active woman.•Anodal-tDCS improves time to exhaustion in physically active woman. The limiting factors of maximum performance in humans have been extensively investigated. The aim of this study was to verify the acute effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on time limit (i.e., the time by which an individual is able to sustain a certain intensity of effort) at 100% of peak power (tlim@100%PP) and ratings of perceived exertion (RPE). Eleven moderately active women underwent an anthropometric evaluation and a maximal incremental test in the cycle ergometer, in order to obtain peak power (PP). At the two subsequent visits, which were separated by 48–72h, participants were randomly assigned to two experimental conditions: anodal stimulation (a-tDCS) and sham. In the a-tDCS condition, the stimulus was applied in the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), with intensity of 2mA for 20min. In the sham condition, the equipment was switched off after 30s of stimulation. Immediately after the conditions, participants performed the tlim@100%PP. Immediately after the tlim@100%PP test, the RPE scale was applied. The results demonstrated that the tlim@100%PP was higher in a-tDCS condition compared to sham condition (p=0.005). No difference was found between the conditions (a-tDCS vs sham) for the RPE (p=0.52). The anodal stimulus increased the tolerance to the exercise performed in the cycloergometer with maximum load, having some ergogenic effect in exercises of cyclic characteristics.