Leanness assessment of organizational performance: a systematic literature review

• Published in: Journal of manufacturing technology management Vol. 29; no. 5; pp. 768 - 788
• Main Authors: Sangwa, Narpat Ram, Sangwan, Kuldip Singh
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Bradford Emerald Publishing Limited 23.05.2018; Emerald Group Publishing Limited
• Subjects: Advanced manufacturing technologies; Customer relations; Empirical analysis; English language; Failure; Lean manufacturing; Literature reviews; Performance evaluation; Philosophy; Planning; Process management; Product development; Suppliers; Supply chains; Systematic review; Lean manufacturing; Performance measurement; Performance indicators
• ISSN: 1741-038X; 1758-7786
• DOI: 10.1108/JMTM-09-2017-0196

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to review various themes of leanness, leanness assessment approaches, leanness assessment areas, and their evolution by a systematic literature review (SLR). Design/methodology/approach The eight types of literature review methodologies are identified and compared. The SLR is selected after critically analyzing the eight types of literature reviews. A four-phased SLR (i.e. plan, do, analyze/synthesize, and propose) has been carried out based on the peer-reviewed journal and conference articles on leanness assessment. Findings The existing literature on leanness assessment shows the lack of review-based papers on lean assessment. This study attempts to build a two-fold contribution to the field of leanness assessment: first, various types of themes, approaches, and assessment areas are identified; second, a framework for leanness assessment is proposed. The study shows that the research on leanness assessment is mainly empirical using qualitative judgment. The paper traces the changes in scope, areas, and approaches to leanness assessment. The scope of leanness assessment broadened from manufacturing process assessment to whole supply chain assessment including manufacturing process. The focus of earlier assessment was manufacturing and financial areas which now includes human resource, administration, new product development, suppliers, and customers also. Tool and technique based assessment has given way to outcome-based assessment using non-financial and qualitative parameters. Research limitations/implications One of the limitations of the study is that literature search was mainly focused on peer-reviewed articles published in English language only; therefore, some papers in others languages may have been missed. Apart from this, the SLR has been conducted for the manufacturing sector only. Practical implications The study is expected to be useful for the lean practitioners to identify the causes of reported lean failures. Moreover, the authors also expect that the conducted SLR will provide the passage to the practitioners for not only fostering the concepts on leanness assessment but also provide the vital and significant knowledge about the leanness assessment to the managers for enhancing organizational performance. Originality/value As per the authors’ knowledge, this is the first SLR on leanness assessment. It is expected that this paper will help the researchers working in the area of lean manufacturing to identify new areas of research.