Determining the Most Robust Dimensional Structure of Categories from the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Across Subgroups of Persons With Spinal Cord Injury to Build the Basis for Future Clinical Measures

Abstract Objective To determine the most robust dimensional structure of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) categories relevant to spinal cord injury (SCI) across subgroups of lesion level, health care context, sex, age, and resources of the country. Design...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inArchives of physical medicine and rehabilitation Vol. 95; no. 11; pp. 2111 - 2119.e12
Main Authors Ballert, Carolina S., Msc Dpl Stat, Stucki, Gerold, MD, MS, Biering-Sørensen, Fin, MD, PhD, Cieza, Alarcos, PhD
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.11.2014
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract Objective To determine the most robust dimensional structure of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) categories relevant to spinal cord injury (SCI) across subgroups of lesion level, health care context, sex, age, and resources of the country. Design A multidimensional between-item response Rasch model was used. The choice of the dimensions was conceptually driven using the ICF components from the functioning chapters and splits of the activity and participation component described in the ICF. Setting Secondary analysis of data from an international, cross-sectional, multicentric study for the Development of ICF Core Sets for Spinal Cord Injury. Participants Persons with SCI (N=1048) from the early postacute and long-term living context from 14 middle/low- and high-resource countries. Interventions Not applicable. Main Outcome Measure Ratings of categories of the ICF relevant for SCI were analyzed. Results Five models were tested on the complete sample and 5 subgroups. The overall reliability of all models and reliability within dimensions of the unidimensional and 2-dimensional models were good to excellent. The ICF categories spread well along the disability scale. The model fit improvement from the unidimensional to the 2-dimensional and from the 2-dimensional to the 3-dimensional model was significant in all groups ( P <.0001). The improvement, however, from a unidimensional to a 2-dimensional structure was markedly better than from a 2-dimensional to a 3-dimensional one. Conclusions We propose that a 2-dimensional structure separating body functions and body structures from the activity and participation categories should serve as a basis for developing clinical measures in SCI in the future.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0003-9993
1532-821X
DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2014.07.004