Diagnostic accuracy of esophageal capsule endoscopy versus conventional upper digestive endoscopy for suspected esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

• Published in: Endoscopy Vol. 42; no. 2; p. 93
• Main Authors: Heresbach, D, Leray, E, d'Halluin, P N, Cholet, F, Lapalus, M G, Gaudric, M, Ben Soussan, E, Gaudin, J L, Vahedi, K, Quentin, V, Filoche, B, Saurin, J C, Chaussade, S, Ponchon, T
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Germany 01.02.2010
• Subjects: Adult; Aged; Capsule Endoscopy - methods; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - diagnosis; Diagnosis, Differential; Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal - methods; Esophageal Neoplasms - diagnosis; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Reproducibility of Results; Sensitivity and Specificity
• ISSN: 1438-8812
• DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1243856

A video capsule similar to that used in small-bowel capsule endoscopy is now available for esophageal exploration. The aim of our study was to compare the accuracy of upper endoscopy (esophageal gastroduodenoscopy [EGE]) with esophageal capsule endoscopy (ECE) in patients at risk of esophageal squamous cell cancer (SCC). 68 patients at risk of SCC secondary to a history of head and neck neoplasia were included in this comparison of techniques for detecting SCC and dysplasia. ECE was done using the first generation Pillcam ESO and EGE was performed in accordance with the usual practice of each center, followed by examination with 2 % Lugol staining and biopsy of unstained areas (39 neoplasia comprising 5 low grade dysplasia, 8 high grade dysplasia and 26 SCC). Compared with EGE with and without Lugol staining, the sensitivities of ECE for neoplasia diagnosis were 46 % and 54 %, respectively. On a per-patient basis, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value of ECE were 63 %, 86 %, 77 % and 76 %, respectively, compared with EGE without staining, and 61 %, 86 %, 77 % and 73 % compared with EGE with iodine staining. Neither the ECE transit time nor the distance between the esopharyngeal line and the neoplastic lesion differed between the 21 false-negative and 18 true-positive cases diagnosed by ECE; the only difference was a smaller median diameter among false negatives ( P < 0.001). In a cohort at high risk for esophageal SCC, ECE is not sensitive enough to diagnose neoplastic lesions.