A reproducible and reliable localization technique for lumbar spine surgery that minimizes unintended-level exposure and wrong-level surgery

• Published in: The spine journal Vol. 19; no. 5; pp. 773 - 780
• Main Authors: Patel, Anuj, Runner, Robert P., Bellamy, J. Taylor, Rhee, John M.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01.05.2019
• Subjects: Adult; Aged; Complication; Decompression, Surgical - adverse effects; Decompression, Surgical - methods; Exposure; Female; Humans; Incorrect-site surgery; Localization; Lumbosacral Region - diagnostic imaging; Lumbosacral Region - surgery; Male; Middle Aged; Novel technique; Posterior lumbar spine surgery; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology; Postoperative Complications - etiology; Postoperative Complications - prevention & control; Radiography; Spinal Fusion - adverse effects; Spinal Fusion - methods; Wrong-level surgery; Posterior lumbar spine surgery; Complication; Incorrect-site surgery; Exposure; Localization; Novel technique; Wrong-level surgery
• ISSN: 1529-9430; 1878-1632
• DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.12.005

Exposure of unintended levels (defined as a spinal segment outside the intended surgical levels) is unnecessary and potentially adds to operative time and patient morbidity. Wrong-level surgery (defined as decompression, instrumentation, or fusion of a spinal segment not part of the intended surgical procedure) clearly adds to morbidity as well as putting the surgeon at medicolegal risk. To describe a localization technique for posterior lumbar spine surgery to minimize both unintended-level exposure and wrong-level surgery. Consecutive case series. One thousand nine hundred and eighty-six consecutive posterior lumbar operations performed from January 2010 to January 2017 using this technique were reviewed. The primary outcome measure was the incidence of unintended-level exposure and wrong-level surgery. This localization technique was consistently used for determination of skin incision, soft tissue dissection, and identification of spinal levels for all patients undergoing posterior lumbar surgery during the time interval noted. Two spinal needles are inserted under sterile technique 3cm lateral to the midline before incision at the approximate cranial and caudal aspects of the anticipated incision based on external landmarks. A cross-table lateral X-ray before incision is obtained and the actual incision is adjusted based on the location of the spinal needles. Once dissection is carried down to the facet capsules, spinal needles are then placed in adjacent facets, and a second cross-table lateral film is obtained to confirm appropriate levels. A retrospective review of all posterior lumbar cases was performed to determine the incidence of unintended-level exposure and wrong-level surgery using this technique. There were no wrong-level surgeries during this time period. There were six (0.30%) cases of unintended-level exposure. The technique described provides surgeons with a reliable, accurate, and easily reproducible method for localizing surgical levels during posterior lumbar spine surgery while minimizing exposure of uninvolved areas. This technique offers distinct advantages over previously proposed protocols and may lead to a widely accepted system for intraoperative spinal level identification.