Startle activation is additive with voluntary cortical activation irrespective of stimulus modality

• Published in: Neuroscience letters Vol. 606; pp. 151 - 155
• Main Authors: Maslovat, Dana, Drummond, Neil M., Carter, Michael J., Carlsen, Anthony N.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Ireland Elsevier Ireland Ltd 08.10.2015
• Subjects: Acoustic Stimulation; Additive model; Adult; Cerebral Cortex - physiology; ECR; extensor carpi radialis; FCR; flexor carpi radialis; Humans; imperative stimulus; Initiation; Motor preparation; Neural activation; Photic Stimulation; Reaction Time; Reflex, Startle; SAS; SCM; Startle; startling acoustic stimulus; sternocleidomastoid; Young Adult; FCR; SAS; ECR; Neural activation; Startle; IS; SCM; Additive model; Initiation; Motor preparation; imperative stimulus; sternocleidomastoid; startling acoustic stimulus; flexor carpi radialis; extensor carpi radialis
• ISSN: 0304-3940; 1872-7972
• DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2015.08.053

•An additive and horse-race model of initiation activation were investigated.•A startling acoustic stimulus (SAS) followed a visual “go” cue in a simple RT task.•An additive model predicted the observed RTs more closely than a horse-race model.•Results indicated that both voluntary and SAS activation contribute to RT. When a startling acoustic stimulus (SAS) is presented during a simple reaction time (RT) task, it can trigger the prepared response through an involuntary initiation pathway. Previous research modelling the effects of presenting a SAS at various intervals following a non-startling auditory imperative signal (IS) suggested that involuntary initiation-related neural activation is additive with the voluntary initiation processes. The current study tested the predictions of this additive model when the SAS and IS are of different modalities by using a visual rather than auditory go-signal. Because voluntary RT latencies are delayed for visual stimuli compared to acoustic stimuli, it was hypothesised that the time course of additive activation would be similarly delayed. Participants performed 150 RT trials requiring a targeted 20° wrist extension task with a SAS presented 0–125ms following a visual go-signal. Results were not different to those predicted by an additive model (p=0.979), yet were significantly different to those predicted by a horse-race model (p=0.037), indicating a joint contribution of voluntary and involuntary activation, even when the IS and SAS are of different modalities. Furthermore, the results indicated that voluntary RT differences due to stimulus modality are attributable to processes that occur prior to the increase in initiation-related activation.