Medical student otolaryngology research: Involvement, perceptions, motivations

• Published in: American journal of otolaryngology Vol. 44; no. 6; p. 103977
• Main Authors: Glehan, Alexander, Ramsey, Tam, Kumaresan, Talitha, Setzen, Sean, Gildener-Leapman, Neil
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01.11.2023
• Subjects: Medical student research; Otolaryngology; Perceptions; Residency; Otolaryngology; Perceptions; Medical student research; Residency
• ISSN: 0196-0709; 1532-818X
• DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2023.103977

Otolaryngology is a competitive specialty that emphasizes research. This study explored medical student involvement in otolaryngology research including training, productivity, perceptions and career goals. Cross-sectional survey. A 27 question multiple choice survey was generated using Qualtrics and posted on an otolaryngology forum (Otomatch) from 10/09/2022 to 12/11/2022. Thirty fourth year medical students (MS4) applying to U.S. otolaryngology residency programs responded. Nearly all (26/30 = 86.7 %) believe there should be dedicated time to research in medical school. MS4 produced an average of 3.23 otolaryngology papers (± 3.13), 5.23 poster presentations (± 9.22) and 2.50 oral presentations (± 5.06). MS4 feel it is more important for physicians to read (mean 4.47 on a 5-point scale; ± 0.76) than to conduct research (3.03 ± 0.87) or to emphasize it in evaluating residency applicants (2.79 ± 0.96). Seventeen respondents (17/30 = 56.7 %) lack interest in continuing research after medical school. Twenty-eight MS4 were evenly split (14/30 = 46.7 %) between a research-heavy or traditional residency. Students felt pressure to publish in low-impact journals (3.93 ± 0.94) for career advancement. All respondents were involved in research yet the majority (16/30 = 53.3 %) eschew a research-heavy residency. Using research to evaluate success entices involvement for some who may not be interested. Pressure to publish may exacerbate ethical issues like inaccurately assigned authorship and deceptive reporting of publications. A decreased emphasis on research will enable students truly interested to continue without pressure to publish, leading to a potential increase in generalizable studies.