Risk effects of high and low relative humidity on allergic rhinitis: Time series study

The relationship between environmental factors and allergic rhinitis (AR) has become a focal point recently. However, few studies have investigated the adverse effects of both high relative humidity (RH) and low relative humidity. Moreover, the laged effect and disease burden of RH on AR were also n...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEnvironmental research Vol. 173; pp. 373 - 378
Main Authors Duan, Jun, Wang, Xu, Zhao, Desheng, Wang, Shusi, Bai, Lijun, Cheng, Qiang, Gao, Jiaojiao, Xu, ZiHan, Zhang, Yanwu, Zhang, Heng, Su, Hong
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Netherlands Elsevier Inc 01.06.2019
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The relationship between environmental factors and allergic rhinitis (AR) has become a focal point recently. However, few studies have investigated the adverse effects of both high relative humidity (RH) and low relative humidity. Moreover, the laged effect and disease burden of RH on AR were also neglected. To explore the association of both high and low RH on daily AR hospital outpatients, and to quantify the corresponding disease burden attributable to RH. In our study, we define 95th as high RH and 5th as low RH. A distributed lag non-linear model (DLNM) combined with a Poisson generalized linear regression model were applied to analyze the relationship between RH and hospital outpatients for AR. All patients were retrieved from Anhui Provincial Children's Hospital (n = 37,221) from January 2015 to December 2016. Daily meteorological and air pollutant data were collected by Hefei Meteorological Bureau and Environmental Protection Agency. Subgroup analyses were conducted by gender and occupational groups. Acute adverse effects of high and low RH on AR were explored respectively, with an increase of daily AR outpatients when encountered high and low RH. The low RH presented a risk effect at current day and lasted up to the eighth day. However, high RH began to appear a risk effect on the fourth day. Notably, the fraction of hospital outpatients attributable to low RH was 5.22% (95% CI: 1.92%, 8.33%) and high RH was 4.07% (95% CI: 1.13%, 7.30%) in the backward perspective. Additionally, male and students apparent to be more sensitive to the effects of low RH. This study suggests that both high and low RH are potential trigger for AR hospital outpatients in Hefei, China. Our studies might offer valuable messages to health practitioners and useful direction to decisions-makers respectively. •Adverse effects of both high and low RH on AR were explored respectively.•Through DLNM, we controlled several important mixed factors (PM2.5, SO2 and NO2) to explore their lag effects.•Male and students appeared to be more vulnerable to the effects of low RH in our study.
ISSN:0013-9351
1096-0953
DOI:10.1016/j.envres.2019.03.040