Detection and characterization of Plum pox virus: serological methods

• Published in: Bulletin OEPP Vol. 36; no. 2; pp. 254 - 261
• Main Authors: Cambra, M., Boscia, D., Myrta, A., Palkovics, L., Navrátil, M., Barba, M., Gorris, M. T., Capote, N.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.08.2006
• Subjects: Plum pox virus
• ISSN: 0250-8052; 1365-2338
• DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2338.2006.00983.x

Tremendous progress has been made in the research and development of Plum pox virus (PPV) serological reagents and methods in recent years. Two facts have revolutionised the serological detection and characterization of the virus: the development of the ELISA method in 1977, and the later emergence of specific monoclonal antibody technology. The availability of commercial kits has popularised PPV diagnosis, now making diagnosis possible at large scale for quarantine purposes, eradication programmes and control of the disease in nurseries. The use of the universal monoclonal antibody 5B‐IVIA, used in DASI‐ELISA, is the most accurate system for routine PPV detection. Likewise, the use of typing monoclonal antibodies gives exact characterization of the main PPV types described: 4DG5 for PPV‐D, AL for PPV‐M, EA24 for PPV‐EA, and TUV and AC for PPV‐C. There is, in general, an excellent correlation between serological data obtained with PPV specific monoclonal antibodies and data obtained by molecular PCR based methods. ELISA using a single or a mixture of monoclonal antibodies will remain the preferred method for universal detection and routine screening of PPV for years to come. Today, other serological methods and reagents are also recommended in the EPPO Diagnostic Protocol, increasing the number of reliable tests available for PPV detection. These developments have helped to control sharka disease in recent years. International co‐operation in this field has been crucial to the improvement and validation of serological tools for PPV detection and characterization.