Selective Absorbing Surface Based on CrO3: Evaluation of Substrates Treatment Influence on the Films Optical Properties

• Published in: Energies (Basel) Vol. 16; no. 1; p. 318
• Main Authors: Pereira, Gustavo Furtado, Oliveira, Aline da Silva, Gomes, Kelly Cristiane, Silva Neto, José Félix, Simões, Thiago Araújo, Leal, Antônio Farias, Torres, Sandro Marden, Lima Filho, Marçal Rosas Florentino
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Basel MDPI AG 01.01.2023
• Subjects: Absorptivity; Alternative energy sources; Chromium; Chromium trioxide; Coatings; CrO3; Deposition; Electroplating; Electropolishing; Emissions; Emissivity; Energy; Infrared spectroscopy; Optical properties; Plating; Radiation; Scanning electron microscopy; selective absorbing surface; Selectivity; Solar energy; Spectrum analysis; Stainless steel; Substrates; Surface treatment; Thin films
• ISSN: 1996-1073; 1996-1073
• DOI: 10.3390/en16010318

Solar energy presents the greatest potential by which to produce heat energy with reduced carbon emissions for power generation. To increase its harvesting and conversion, it is necessary to understand fundamental concepts and develop new materials. Although many processes can obtain selective absorbing surfaces (SAS) for application in solar energy exploitation, including electroplating methods, those processes have not sufficiently investigated the substrate’s treatment impact. The present work investigates 304 stainless steel (SS304) substrates treatment influence on the film’s (coatings) optical properties of SAS based on CrO3 electroplating. For this purpose, three main steps featured in the methodology: substrates treatment, coatings deposition, and physical-chemical characterization. The former was performed by detergent cleaning (DC), acid treatment (AT), and electropolishing (EP). Then, coatings were electroplated towards chromium deposition on the substrates with different deposition times. Finally, films were characterized by Profilometry, UV-Vis-NIR, and IR regions Spectroscopy and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). The results indicated that, in terms of surface treatments on the substrate, the electropolished (EP) substrates presented average roughness values of 35 nm, reflectivity of 5.09%, and clear morphological difference (SEM) when compared to other treatments in this study (DC and AT). A SAS was successfully obtained, and the electropolished substrates (EP) presented coatings with better optical performance than other samples (DC and AT), with absorptivity values around 98% and emissivity of approximately 7%. A relationship between substrate treatment, its roughness, and the impacts on the optical selectivity of SASs was observed. Therefore, electropolishing is presented as a promising treatment for the SASs substrates.