Structural insights into the substrate specificity of IMP-6 and IMP-1 metallo-β-lactamases

IMP-type metallo-β-lactamases confer resistance to carbapenems and a broad spectrum of β-lactam antibiotics. IMP-6 and IMP-1 differ by only a point mutation: Ser262 in IMP-1 and Gly262 in IMP-6. The kcat/Km values of IMP-1 for imipenem and meropenem are nearly identical; however, for IMP-6, the kcat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of biochemistry (Tokyo) Vol. 173; no. 1; pp. 21 - 30
Main Authors Yamamoto, Keizo, Tanaka, Hideaki, Kurisu, Genji, Nakano, Ryuichi, Yano, Hisakazu, Sakai, Hiromi
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Oxford University Press 01.01.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:IMP-type metallo-β-lactamases confer resistance to carbapenems and a broad spectrum of β-lactam antibiotics. IMP-6 and IMP-1 differ by only a point mutation: Ser262 in IMP-1 and Gly262 in IMP-6. The kcat/Km values of IMP-1 for imipenem and meropenem are nearly identical; however, for IMP-6, the kcat/Km for meropenem is 7-fold that for imipenem. In clinical practice, this may result in an ineffective therapeutic regimen and, consequently, in treatment failure. Here, we report the crystal structures of IMP-6 and IMP-1 with the same space group and similar cell constants at resolutions of 1.70 and 1.94 Å, respectively. The overall structures of IMP-6 and IMP-1 are similar. However, the loop region (residues 60-66), which participates in substrate binding, is more flexible in IMP-6 than in IMP-1. This difference in flexibility determines the substrate specificity of IMP-type metallo-β-lactamases for imipenem and meropenem. The amino acid at position 262 alters the mobility of His263; this affects the flexibility of the loop via a hydrogen bond with Pro68, which plays the role of a hinge in IMP-type metallo-β-lactamases. The substitution of Pro68 with a glycine elicited an increase in the Km of IMP-6 for imipenem, whereas the affinity for meropenem remained unchanged.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0021-924X
1756-2651
DOI:10.1093/jb/mvac080