Evaluation of the mechanical performance of AC mixtures with recycled fibres

Based on the positive results of most of the studies using virgin fibres to reinforce asphalt mixes, this work proposes the use of recycled fibres in order to go a step further in terms of environmental impact and cost-efficiency. Different experimental asphalt concrete (AC) mixtures are proposed, i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inDevelopments in the built environment Vol. 18; p. 100435
Main Authors Miera-Dominguez, Helena, Lastra-González, Pedro, Indacoechea-Vega, Irune, Castro-Fresno, Daniel
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Ltd 01.04.2024
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Based on the positive results of most of the studies using virgin fibres to reinforce asphalt mixes, this work proposes the use of recycled fibres in order to go a step further in terms of environmental impact and cost-efficiency. Different experimental asphalt concrete (AC) mixtures are proposed, incorporating three types of recycled fibres. Mechanical performance is assessed through the Marshall, water sensitivity and wheel tracking tests, as well as stiffness and fatigue tests to assess dynamic performance. The results obtained from the different tests performed are analysed by means of a multi-criteria analysis to obtain the asphalt mix with the best performance. The results show that all the tested fibres are suitable for the reinforcement of asphalt mixtures, as the values obtained improved those of the reference mixture, although without reaching the behaviour of a mixture with polymer modified bitumen (PMB). The recycled aramid fibres showed the best results. •All recycled fibres studied improved the mechanical performance of the mixtures.•Resistance against plastic deformation is the most improved property.•Recycled aramid fibres showed the best reinforcement of asphalt concrete mixtures.•Mechanical impact of fibres does not reach the performance of PMB.
ISSN:2666-1659
2666-1659
DOI:10.1016/j.dibe.2024.100435