Variability of resting respiratory drive and timing in healthy subjects

Studies of breathing pattern have focused primarily on changes in the mean values of the breathing pattern components, whereas there has been minimal investigation of breath-to-breath variability, which should provide information on the constancy with which respiration is controlled. In this study w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of applied physiology (1985) Vol. 65; no. 1; p. 309
Main Authors Tobin, M J, Mador, M J, Guenther, S M, Lodato, R F, Sackner, M A
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.07.1988
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Studies of breathing pattern have focused primarily on changes in the mean values of the breathing pattern components, whereas there has been minimal investigation of breath-to-breath variability, which should provide information on the constancy with which respiration is controlled. In this study we examined the variability of breathing pattern both on a breath-to-breath and day-to-day basis by calculating the coefficient of variation (i.e., the standard deviation expressed as a percentage of the mean). By examining breath-to-breath data, we found that the coefficients of variation of tidal volume (VT) and fractional inspiratory time (TI/TT, an index of timing) obtained with an inductive plethysmograph and spirometer were within 1% of each other. Examination of breath-to-breath variability in breathing pattern over a 15-min period in 65 subjects revealed large coefficients of variation, indicating the need to base calculations on a relatively large number of breaths. Less breath-to-breath variability was observed in respiratory frequency [f, 20.8 +/- 11.5% (SD)] and TI/TT (17.9 +/- 6.5%) than in VT (33 +/- 14.9%) and mean inspiratory flow (VT/TI, an index of drive; 31.6 +/- 12.6%; P less than 0.0001). Older subjects (60-81 yr) displayed greater breath-to-breath variability than young subjects (21-50 yr). Use of a mouthpiece did not affect the degree of variability.
ISSN:8750-7587
DOI:10.1152/jappl.1988.65.1.309