Comparative effects of two endodontic irrigants, chlorhexidine digluconate and sodium hypochlorite, on macrophage adhesion to plastic surfaces

This study was designed to compare the “in vitro” effect of chlorhexidine digluconate, proposed as a new irrigant solution, with sodium hypochlorite, the currently irrigant solution used to disinfect the root canal system before obturation of the canal, on substrate adherence capacity of macrophages...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of endodontics Vol. 25; no. 4; pp. 243 - 246
Main Authors Segura, Juan José, Jiménez-Rubio, Alicia, Guerrero, Juan Miguel, Calvo, Juan Ramón
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.04.1999
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This study was designed to compare the “in vitro” effect of chlorhexidine digluconate, proposed as a new irrigant solution, with sodium hypochlorite, the currently irrigant solution used to disinfect the root canal system before obturation of the canal, on substrate adherence capacity of macrophages. Inflammatory macrophages were obtained from Wistar rats and resuspended in RPMI-1640 medium. The adherence capacity of macrophages to a plastic surface was determined. Assays were conducted in Eppendorf tubes for 15 min of incubation at 37°C in an humidified atmosphere of 5% CO 2 in air. The adherence index was calculated. Chlorhexidine digluconate inhibited substrate adherence capacity of macrophages in all conditions tested. Half-maximal inhibition (IC 50) was observed at 1:5.6 dilution. Chlorhexidine digluconate was less potent than 5.25% sodium hypochlorite (IC 50 = 1:24.1 dilution) in inhibiting substrate adherence capacity of macrophages. Taking into account that substrate adherence is the first step in the phagocytic process of macrophages and in antigen presentation, chlorhexidine digluconate could inhibit macrophage function and modulate inflammatory reactions at the level of inflamed periapical tissues.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0099-2399
1878-3554
DOI:10.1016/S0099-2399(99)80151-4