Survey of 8 UAV Set-Covering Algorithms for Terrain Photogrammetry

• Published in: Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland) Vol. 12; no. 14; p. 2285
• Main Authors: Hammond, Joshua E., Vernon, Cory A., Okeson, Trent J., Barrett, Benjamin J., Arce, Samuel, Newell, Valerie, Janson, Joseph, Franke, Kevin W., Hedengren, John D.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Basel MDPI AG 01.07.2020
• Subjects: Aerial photography; Aircraft; Algorithms; Ant colony optimization; Art galleries & museums; Automation; Cameras; Canyons; Computer applications; Computer simulation; Environmental monitoring; Greedy algorithms; Iterative methods; Lidar; Linear programming; Mathematical models; Monitoring instruments; Particle swarm optimization; Photogrammetry; Problem solving; Quality; Remote sensing; Researchers; Sensitivity analysis; set-covering problem; Simulated annealing; Software; Statistical analysis; structure-from-motion; Surveillance; uav; Unmanned aerial vehicles
• ISSN: 2072-4292; 2072-4292
• DOI: 10.3390/rs12142285

Remote sensing with unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) facilitates photogrammetry for environmental and infrastructural monitoring. Models are created with less computational cost by reducing the number of photos required. Optimal camera locations for reducing the number of photos needed for structure-from-motion (SfM) are determined through eight mathematical set-covering algorithms as constrained by solve time. The algorithms examined are: traditional greedy, reverse greedy, carousel greedy (CG), linear programming, particle swarm optimization, simulated annealing, genetic, and ant colony optimization. Coverage and solve time are investigated for these algorithms. CG is the best method for choosing optimal camera locations as it balances number of photos required and time required to calculate camera positions as shown through an analysis similar to a Pareto Front. CG obtains a statistically significant 3.2 fewer cameras per modeled area than base greedy algorithm while requiring just one additional order of magnitude of solve time. For comparison, linear programming is capable of fewer cameras than base greedy but takes at least three orders of magnitude longer to solve. A grid independence study serves as a sensitivity analysis of the CG algorithms α (iteration number) and β (percentage to be recalculated) parameters that adjust traditional greedy heuristics, and a case study at the Rock Canyon collection dike in Provo, UT, USA, compares the results of all eight algorithms and the uniqueness (in terms of percentage comparisons based on location/angle metadata and qualitative visual comparison) of each selected set. Though this specific study uses SfM, the principles could apply to other instruments such as multi-spectral cameras or aerial LiDAR.