The Necessity of Value Pluralism in Administrative Practice A Reply to Overeem

Overeem and Verhoef’s critique of my understanding of value pluralism (VP) in public administration boils down to two points. First, VP is a meta-ethical position that has little or no truck with the practical field of public administration. And, second, as they argue, even if we granted that VP mig...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAdministration & society Vol. 46; no. 8; pp. 1020 - 1028
Main Author Wagenaar, Hendrik
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Los Angeles, CA SAGE Publications 01.10.2014
SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC
Subjects
Consciousness
Ethics
Judgement
Judgment
Management theory
Moral Judgment
Morality
Morals
Motor Trucks
Pluralism
Political philosophy
Public Administration
Self
Society
Studies
Values
public administration
political philosophy
value pluralism
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Overeem and Verhoef’s critique of my understanding of value pluralism (VP) in public administration boils down to two points. First, VP is a meta-ethical position that has little or no truck with the practical field of public administration. And, second, as they argue, even if we granted that VP might be relevant to real-world events, it would be impossible to infer from it the kind of choices that I suggest, as is allegedly demonstrated by the “inconsistency” beween my position and that of Spicer in this issue. Against this I argue for a pragmatist perspective on VP. In a multi-faceted, conflictual world we have no choice but to engage in practical moral judgment. This is called moral awareness and it enhances our understanding of self and the world that we work and live in. Moral awareness also sustains one of the central tasks of public administration: the creation of a just and democratic society.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0095-3997
1552-3039
DOI:10.1177/0095399714550856