Air-classified faba bean protein fraction as a substitute to soybean meal in pelleted and extruded broiler diets

• Published in: British poultry science Vol. 63; no. 1; pp. 62 - 72
• Main Authors: Itani, K., Hansen, J. Ø., Kierończyk, B., Benzertiha, A., Kurk, A. E., Ånestad, R. M., Schüller, R. B., Mydland, L. T., Svihus, B., Øverland, M.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Taylor & Francis 02.01.2022
• Subjects: air-classification; Animal Feed - analysis; Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena; Animals; broilers; Chickens; Diet - veterinary; Digestion; Faba beans; feed intake; feed processing; Glycine max; Male; protein; soybean meal; Vicia faba; feed processing; protein; feed intake; soybean meal; broilers; air-classification; Faba beans
• ISSN: 0007-1668; 1466-1799
• DOI: 10.1080/00071668.2021.1960949

1. The hypothesis that air-classified faba bean protein fraction (FBP) can replace soybean meal (SBM) in pelleted or extruded broiler diets without adverse effect on performance or nutrient digestibility was tested. 2. At 17 d of age, male broilers were randomly distriibuted among four dietary treatments consisting of either SBM or FBP (main dietary protein source) and pelleting or extrusion as processing methods. Treatments had 10 replicate pens containing five birds each. 3. Compared to SBM, birds fed FBP had significantly lower feed intake, less weight gain and had poorer feed conversion. 4. Pellet durability was high (above 92%) for all diets. In pelleted diets, FBP was harder than SBM whereas extruded diets had similar hardness. Pelleting increased water stability compared to extrusion. FBP diets were more water stable than the SBM diets. 5. Gizzard content weight was 2.2-fold higher (P = 0.002) for birds given FBP compared to those fed SBM. The weight of the jejunum and ileum with contents was 1.4-fold lower for the FBP diets, and this effect was larger (P < 0.05) for the extruded FBP diet. 6. Birds fed FBP diets had significantly higher nitrogen digestibility in the lower jejunum and ileum compared to those given SBM diets, while the starch digestibility coefficient was above 0.980 in all treatments. 7. The high nutrient digestibility of FBP diets indicates that the poor performance of the FBP group was due to lower feed intake which was not explained by the differences in pellet durability or hardness. The reduced palatability of the FBP and the longer retention of the FBP diets in the upper gut are more likely to have depressed feed intake.