Deep Clouds on Jupiter

• Published in: Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland) Vol. 15; no. 3; p. 702
• Main Authors: Wong, Michael H., Bjoraker, Gordon L., Goullaud, Charles, Stephens, Andrew W., Luszcz-Cook, Statia H., Atreya, Sushil K., de Pater, Imke, Brown, Shannon T.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Basel MDPI AG 01.02.2023
• Subjects: Abundance; Aerosols; Altitude; Atmosphere; Atmospheric models; Atmospheric water; Base pressure; Clouds; Cosmic rays; Deep water; Gases; Haze; Hubble Space Telescope; Hubble Space Telescope observations; In situ measurement; Infrared imaging; infrared observations; Infrared spectra; Infrared telescopes; Jupiter; Jupiter atmosphere; Lapse rate; meteorology; Methane; Opacity; Planet formation; Radiative transfer; Remote sensing; Spectroscopy; Storms; Temperature gradients; Troposphere; Vortices
• ISSN: 2072-4292; 2072-4292
• DOI: 10.3390/rs15030702

Jupiter’s atmospheric water abundance is a highly important cosmochemical parameter that is linked to processes of planetary formation, weather, and circulation. Remote sensing and in situ measurement attempts still leave room for substantial improvements to our knowledge of Jupiter’s atmospheric water abundance. With the motivation to advance our understanding of water in Jupiter’s atmosphere, we investigate observations and models of deep clouds. We discuss deep clouds in isolated convective storms (including a unique storm site in the North Equatorial Belt that episodically erupted in 2021–2022), cyclonic vortices, and northern high-latitude regions, as seen in Hubble Space Telescope visible/near-infrared imaging data. We evaluate the imaging data in continuum and weak methane band (727 nm) filters by comparison with radiative transfer simulations, 5 micron imaging (Gemini), and 5 micron spectroscopy (Keck), and conclude that the weak methane band imaging approach mostly detects variation in the upper cloud and haze opacity, although sensitivity to deeper cloud layers can be exploited if upper cloud/haze opacity can be separately constrained. The cloud-base water abundance is a function of cloud-base temperature, which must be estimated by extrapolating 0.5-bar observed temperatures downward to the condensation region near 5 bar. For a given cloud base pressure, the largest source of uncertainty on the local water abundance comes from the temperature gradient used for the extrapolation. We conclude that spatially resolved spectra to determine cloud heights—collected simultaneously with spatially-resolved mid-infrared spectra to determine 500-mbar temperatures and with improved lapse rate estimates—would be needed to answer the following very challenging question: Can observations of deep water clouds on Jupiter be used to constrain the atmospheric water abundance?