Use of transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy in the diagnosis of pelvic malignancies

Purpose. To describe our experience with transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)‐guided needle biopsy of pelvic malignancies. Methods. Eleven patients with clinical suspecion of advanced malignant pelvic tumor were referred to our institution with a history of unsuccessful CT‐guided biopsy, although a target...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of clinical ultrasound Vol. 34; no. 9; pp. 440 - 445
Main Authors Rinnab, Ludwig, Kufer, Rainer, Hautmann, Richard E., Gottfried, Hans-Werner
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 01.11.2006
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Purpose. To describe our experience with transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)‐guided needle biopsy of pelvic malignancies. Methods. Eleven patients with clinical suspecion of advanced malignant pelvic tumor were referred to our institution with a history of unsuccessful CT‐guided biopsy, although a target lesion was demonstrated on pelvic CT or MRI. Cholin‐PET and FDG‐18‐PET were also obtained individually in each patient. TRUS was performed using a commercially available three‐dimensional scanner. Biopsies were performed with an 18G biopsy gun. In 9 of 11 patients, biopsy was successfully performed under analgesia, whereas general anesthesia was required in the other 2 patients. Results. The lesions were identified with TRUS in all patients, and biopsies were taken successfully under TRUS guidance. In all patients, the harvested material was of excellent quality and was adequate for definitive pathological diagnosis. Pathological results included 6 nodal metastases from transitional cell carcinoma, 1 case of lymph node metastasis from prostate cancer, 1 paravesical recurrence of cervical cancer, 1 metastasis from cecal cancer, and 2 cases of paravesical metastasis of a gastric cancer. Conclusion. TRUS‐guided biopsy is a useful technique for the diagnosis of pelvic malignancies. It is faster and less expensive than CT‐guided biopsy, and in most cases sufficient material can be harvested for a definitive pathological diagnosis. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Clin Ultrasound, 2006
Bibliography:istex:0DD37E768ED442B263703D63C18FF660C1F30C6D
ArticleID:JCU20278
ark:/67375/WNG-1083C3QG-L
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0091-2751
1097-0096
DOI:10.1002/jcu.20278