Evapotranspiration trends and variability in southeastern South America: The roles of land‐cover change and precipitation variability

Southeastern South America is subject to considerable precipitation variability on seasonal to decadal timescales and has undergone very heavy land‐cover changes (LCCs) since the middle of the past century. The influence of local LCC and precipitation as drivers of regional evapotranspiration (ET) l...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of climatology Vol. 42; no. 4; pp. 2019 - 2038
Main Authors Ruscica, Romina C., Sörensson, Anna A., Diaz, Leandro B., Vera, Carolina, Castro, Aline, Papastefanou, Phillip, Rammig, Anja, Rezende, Luiz F. C., Sakschewski, Boris, Thonicke, Kirsten, Viovy, Nicolas, Randow, Celso
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Chichester, UK John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 30.03.2022
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Wiley
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Southeastern South America is subject to considerable precipitation variability on seasonal to decadal timescales and has undergone very heavy land‐cover changes (LCCs) since the middle of the past century. The influence of local LCC and precipitation as drivers of regional evapotranspiration (ET) long‐term trends and variability remains largely unknown in the region. Here, ensembles of stand‐alone dynamic global vegetation models (DGVMs) with different atmospheric forcings are used to disentangle the influence of those two drivers on austral summer ET from 1950 to 2010. This paper examines the influence of both the El Niño‐Southern Oscillation (ENSO) and the dipole‐like first‐mode of southeastern South American precipitation variability (EOF1) on regional ET. We found that in the lower La Plata Basin, ET was driven by precipitation variability and showed a positive summer trend. Moreover, the region showed marked seasonal anomalies during El Niño and La Niña summers but mainly during EOF1 phases. On the contrary, in the upper La Plata Basin, LCCs forced the negative summer ET trend and particularly reduced the summer anomalies of the late 1990s, a period of ENSO and EOF1‐positive phases. In the South Atlantic Convergence Zone region, the high ET uncertainty across ensemble members impeded finding robust results, which highlights the importance of using multiple DGVMs and atmospheric forcings instead of relying on single model/forcing results. The South Atlantic Convergence Zone has considerable uncertainty in evapotranspiration (ET) interannual variability and no detectable summer trends despite major land‐cover change (LCC) since 1950. In the upper La Plata Basin, extreme LCC (27% of natural vegetation left by 2010) caused a negative summer ET trend. During summer, ET in the lower La Plata Basin shows a positive trend attributable to precipitation, and variability is governed by El Niño‐Southern Oscillation and the first mode of southeastern South American precipitation variability.
Bibliography:Funding information
CLIMAX Project/Belmont Forum, Grant/Award Numbers: BMBF FKZ 01LP1610A, Belmont Forum/ANR‐15‐JCL/‐0002‐01, FAPESP‐BELMONT‐Process 2015/50687‐8; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Grant/Award Number: 301084/2020‐3; Fondo para la Investigación Científica y Tecnológica, Grant/Award Numbers: PICT 2017‐1406, PICT 2018‐02511; SÃO PAULO STATE RESEARCH FOUNDATION, Grant/Award Numbers: 2015/50687‐8, 2017/03048‐5; TGCC‐GENCI, Grant/Award Number: 2018‐6328; Universidad de Buenos Aires, Grant/Award Number: UBACyT20020170100428BA
ISSN:0899-8418
1097-0088
DOI:10.1002/joc.7350