Validation of two-layer model for underexpanded hydrogen jets

Previous studies have shown that the two-layer model more accurately predicts hydrogen dispersion than the conventional notional nozzle models without significantly increasing the computational expense. However, the model was only validated for predicting the concentration distribution and has not b...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of hydrogen energy Vol. 46; no. 23; pp. 12545 - 12554
Main Authors Li, Xuefang, Chowdhury, Bikram Roy, He, Qian, Christopher, David M., Hecht, Ethan S.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Ltd 31.03.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Previous studies have shown that the two-layer model more accurately predicts hydrogen dispersion than the conventional notional nozzle models without significantly increasing the computational expense. However, the model was only validated for predicting the concentration distribution and has not been adequately validated for predicting the velocity distributions. In the present study, particle imaging velocimetry (PIV) was used to measure the velocity field of an underexpanded hydrogen jet released at 10 bar from a 1.5 mm diameter orifice. The two-layer model was the used to calculate the inlet conditions for a two-dimensional axisymmetric CFD model to simulate the hydrogen jet downstream of the Mach disk. The predicted velocity spreading and centerline decay rates agreed well with the PIV measurements. The predicted concentration distribution was consistent with data from previous planar Rayleigh scattering measurements used to verify the concentration distribution predictions in an earlier study. The jet spreading was also simulated using several widely used notional nozzle models combined with the integral plume model for comparison. These results show that the velocity and concentration distributions are both better predicted by the two-layer model than the notional nozzle models to complement previous studies verifying only the predicted concentration profiles. Thus, this study shows that the two-layer model can accurately predict the jet velocity distributions as well as the concentration distributions as verified earlier. Though more validation studies are needed to improve confidence in the model and increase the range of validity, the present work indicates that the two-layer model is a promising tool for fast, accurate predictions of the flow fields of underexpanded hydrogen jets. •The two-layer model has been validated using concentration and velocity data.•The two-layer model gave better predictions than notional nozzle models.•CFD modeling was significantly simplified by using the two-layer model.
ISSN:0360-3199
1879-3487
DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.08.204