Teaching wicked problems in higher education: ways of thinking and practising
This paper reports on teachers' perspectives on preparing students for working with 'wicked' problems (Rittel and Webber [1973]. 'Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning.' Policy Sciences 4 (2): 155-169.). These problems are complex, lack clear boundaries, and attempts to s...
Saved in:
Published in | Teaching in higher education Vol. 28; no. 7; pp. 1518 - 1533 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Abingdon
Routledge
03.10.2023
Taylor & Francis Ltd |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | This paper reports on teachers' perspectives on preparing students for working with 'wicked' problems (Rittel and Webber [1973]. 'Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning.' Policy Sciences 4 (2): 155-169.). These problems are complex, lack clear boundaries, and attempts to solve them - generally by bringing together multiple stakeholders with contrasting viewpoints - have unforeseen consequences. Examples include many of the most significant current global challenges. We conducted semi-structured interviews with twenty teachers who focused on wicked problems, and a comparison group of 15 . We used the theoretical lenses 'ways of thinking and practising in the subject area' (Anderson and Hounsell [2007]. 'Knowledge Practices: 'Doing the Subject' in Undergraduate Courses.' The Curriculum Journal 18 (4): 463-478. ) and 'figured worlds' (Holland et al. [1998]. Identity and Agency in Cultural Worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.) to frame our analysis. Our findings elaborate four key aspects of learning for wicked problems. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 |
ISSN: | 1356-2517 1470-1294 |
DOI: | 10.1080/13562517.2021.1911986 |