Value and pitfalls of the lateral lung scan

• Published in: Chest Vol. 67; no. 5; p. 549
• Main Authors: Sy, W M, Krol, G, Faunce, H, Bay, R
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01.05.1975
• Subjects: Humans; Lung Diseases - diagnosis; Pulmonary Embolism - diagnosis; Radionuclide Imaging - methods; Radionuclide Imaging - standards; Serum Albumin; Technetium
• ISSN: 0012-3692
• DOI: 10.1378/chest.67.5.549

Two hundred eighty-one of 443 lung scans composed of anterior, posterior, and lateral projections (done in our hospital) demonstrated defects. In 3.9 percent of them (11 cases), the defects were delineated in the lateral views only, while in 29.2 percent (82 cases), the lateral views either outlined additional defects not appreciated on the straight views, or showed more extensive lung involvement. In the majority of instances, 56.6 percent (159 cases), the lateral views showed comparable findings and also tended to segmentally localize the defects better. However, in 10.3 percent (29 cases), defects present on the straight projections were not detected on the lateral views. Various causes that could give rise to artefactural abnormalities in the lateral lung scan and therefore inhibit its proper interpretation, are reviewed and discussed. Despite these problems, the lateral may be the only view to demonstrate abnormalities and, in fact, frequently provides additional useful information.