Emergency intubation with the combitube ®: Comparison with the endotracheal airway

To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Combitube ® as used by ICU nurses under medical supervision compared with endotracheal airway established by ICU physicians during CPR. Prospective study of ICU patients over a seven-month period. Medical ICU. Thirty-seven patients suffering from cardi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAnnals of emergency medicine Vol. 22; no. 10; pp. 1573 - 1575
Main Authors Staudinger, Thomas, Brugger, Stefan, Watschinger, Bruno, Röggla, Martin, Dielacher, Christoph, Löbl, Thomas, Fink, Dieter, Klauser, Renate, Frass, Michael
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Mosby, Inc 01.10.1993
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Combitube ® as used by ICU nurses under medical supervision compared with endotracheal airway established by ICU physicians during CPR. Prospective study of ICU patients over a seven-month period. Medical ICU. Thirty-seven patients suffering from cardiac arrest. Emergency intubation with either the Combitube ® by nurses or the endotracheal airway by physicians and subsequent mechanical ventilation. Evaluation of blood gases after 20 minutes of mechanical ventilation. Intubation time was shorter for the Combitube ® ( P < .001). Blood gases for each device showed comparable results; Pao 2 was slightly higher during ventilation with the Combitube ® ( P <. 001). The Combitube ® as used by ICU nurses was as effective as establishment of the endotracheal airway by intensivists during CPR. The Combitude ® may be used whenever endotracheal intubation cannot be performed immediately.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0196-0644
1097-6760
DOI:10.1016/S0196-0644(05)81261-2