Extent and flux density of static magnetic fields generated by orthodontic samarium-cobalt magnets

The aim of this study was to measure and to analyze the extent and flux density of static magnetic fields generated by commercially available samarium-coblat magnets used in orthodontics. The flux density was measured with a gaussmeter and a Hall probe with the magnets mounted in clinically relevant...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAmerican journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics Vol. 107; no. 5; pp. 488 - 496
Main Authors Bondemark, Lars, Kurol, Jüri, Wisten, Åke
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Mosby, Inc 01.05.1995
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The aim of this study was to measure and to analyze the extent and flux density of static magnetic fields generated by commercially available samarium-coblat magnets used in orthodontics. The flux density was measured with a gaussmeter and a Hall probe with the magnets mounted in clinically relevant positions, i.e., in attractive and in repelling positions and also in the single position. Furthermore, the flux density between new and clinically used and recycled magnets was compared. It was found that the maximum flux density was generated at the pole faces and that magnets in attractive positions produced the highest flux density (2.2 kG), followed by the single magnet (2.0 kG) and the repelling magnets (1.7 kG). The flux density decreased rapidly (exponentially) with increased distance from the magnets. The flux density was approximately the same or less than the flux density of the earth magnetism (0.3 to 0.7 G) 60 mm from the attractive magnets, 50 mm from the single magnets, and 35 mm from the repelling magnets. The difference in flux density between new and clinically used and recycled samarium-cobalt magnets was negligible. Thus, the static magnetic field exposure of surrounding tissues can be assumed to be low, and the conceivable risk of harmful biologic effects must be regarded as small and limited when the tested orthodontic magnets are used clinically. (AM J ORTHOD DENTOFAC ORTHOP 1995;107:488-96.)
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0889-5406
1097-6752
DOI:10.1016/S0889-5406(95)70116-8