Comparison of the capacity of rhTNF-alpha and Escherichia coli to induce procoagulant activity by baboon mononuclear cells in vivo and in vitro

The procoagulant activity of mononuclear cells (MNCs) may play an important role in the disseminated intravascular coagulation seen in septic shock. This study compares the capacity of Escherichia coli (E. coli) and recombinant human TNF-alpha (rhTNF-alpha) to induce procoagulant activity by baboon...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inShock (Augusta, Ga.) Vol. 5; no. 4; p. 274
Main Authors Li, A, Chang, A C, Peer, G T, Hinshaw, L B, Taylor, Jr, F B
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.04.1996
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The procoagulant activity of mononuclear cells (MNCs) may play an important role in the disseminated intravascular coagulation seen in septic shock. This study compares the capacity of Escherichia coli (E. coli) and recombinant human TNF-alpha (rhTNF-alpha) to induce procoagulant activity by baboon MNCs. In vivo studies showed that MNC procoagulant activity was significantly increased at T + 120 min after LD100 E. coli infusion into baboons. Most of this procoagulant activity was attributable to tissue factor. In contrast, a bolus infusion of rhTNF-alpha (150 micrograms/kg) and a monoclonal antibody to activated protein C (2 mg/kg) did not induce any increase of MNC procoagulant activity at T + 120 min even though the plasma TNF-alpha level was 10 times higher than that seen following infusion of E. coli. In vitro studies showed that E. coli at concentrations comparable to that observed in the vivo study and LPS at a concentration of 2.5 ng/mL induced more intense tissue factor expression by both human and baboon monocytes than rhTNF-alpha in the concentrations ranging from 10 to 1,000 ng/mL. These results suggest that TNF-alpha alone is not sufficient to induced noticeable MNC procoagulant activity, at least, in the early stage of this septic shock model.
ISSN:1073-2322
DOI:10.1097/00024382-199604000-00007