Application of Markov Chain Monte Carlo Methods for Uncertainty Quantification in Inverse Transport Problems
Determination of the components of a radioactive source/shield system using the system's radiation signature is of great importance in homeland security, material safeguards, and waste management. Although significant progress has been made toward solving this inverse transport problem in recen...
Saved in:
Published in | IEEE transactions on nuclear science Vol. 68; no. 8; pp. 2210 - 2219 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
New York
IEEE
01.08.2021
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Determination of the components of a radioactive source/shield system using the system's radiation signature is of great importance in homeland security, material safeguards, and waste management. Although significant progress has been made toward solving this inverse transport problem in recent years, work remains to be done to quantify the uncertainty in reconstructed results. In this article we apply two Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) approaches, the delayed rejection adaptive metropolis (DRAM) and differential evolution adaptive metropolis (DREAM) methods, to solve inverse problems and quantify uncertainty. The DRAM method uses delayed rejection combined with global adaptation of the proposal covariance matrix. The DREAM method hybridizes MCMC sampling with the differential evolution (DE) algorithm. In numerical test cases, the DRAM and DREAM methods are shown to be superior to a first-order inverse Hessian approach for problems with noisy data and multiple unknown quantities, with DREAM converging to the posterior distribution more quickly than DRAM. The DREAM and DRAM results indicate that a full posterior distribution is required to quantify uncertainty in many inverse transport problems. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | AC05-00OR22725 USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), Office of Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation |
ISSN: | 0018-9499 1558-1578 |
DOI: | 10.1109/TNS.2021.3089018 |