Weekly gemcitabine and cisplatin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: A phase II study
Background: The combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin has proven effective in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the optimal schedule for administration of the two drugs has not yet been determined. In this study we evaluated the activity and toxicity of a week...
Saved in:
Published in | Annals of oncology Vol. 10; no. 2; pp. 217 - 221 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Oxford
Oxford University Press
01.02.1999
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Background: The combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin has proven effective in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the optimal schedule for administration of the two drugs has not yet been determined. In this study we evaluated the activity and toxicity of a weekly gemcitabine and cisplatin schedule. Patients and methods: Thirty-six untreated patients with stage IIIB-IV NSCLC entered the study. Treatment consisted of gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 i.v. and cisplatin 35 mg/m2 i.v., both given weekly on days 1,8, and 15, followed by one week of rest. Results: Ninety-seven courses (273 weekly administrations) were delivered. The median dose-intensity was 612 mg/m2 per week for gemcitabine (82%) and 21 mg/m2 per week for cisplatin (80%). All 36 of the patients were evaluable for toxicity, and 30 for response. Partial remissions were observed in 12 patients, for an overall response rate of 40% (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 22.5%–57.5%). Most of the partial remissions were seen in IIIB patients (54% of the stage IIIB and 22% of the stage IV patients responded). According to the intent-to-treat principle, the response rate was 33.3% (12 of 36 patients). The median response duration was 9.9 months (range 4ndash;23) and the median survival time 11.8 months (range 1–24). World Health Organization (WHO) grade 3–4 myelotoxicity was: thrombocytopenia in nine patients (25%), neutropenia in six (16.6%) and anemia in six (16.6%); there was very little additional major toxicity. Conclusions: This regimen appears to be active and to have a favourable toxicity profile. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Correspondence to: Professor Riccardo Cellerino, MD, Clinica di Oncologia Medica, Universita di Ancona, Ospedale Torrette, 60020 Ancona, Italy ArticleID:10.2.217 istex:F89A669AF39D9194C4D589FCAC7750C13E48BA5C ark:/67375/HXZ-0064MG5B-D |
ISSN: | 0923-7534 1569-8041 |
DOI: | 10.1023/A:1008323604269 |