Weekly gemcitabine and cisplatin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: A phase II study

Background: The combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin has proven effective in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the optimal schedule for administration of the two drugs has not yet been determined. In this study we evaluated the activity and toxicity of a week...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAnnals of oncology Vol. 10; no. 2; pp. 217 - 221
Main Authors Lippe, P., Tummarello, D., Monterubbianesi, M. C., Silva, R. R., Giuliodori, L., Mari, D., Santo, A., Pasini, F., Cetto, G. L., Rossi, D., Porfiri, E., Cascinu, S., Cellerino, R.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Oxford University Press 01.02.1999
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background: The combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin has proven effective in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the optimal schedule for administration of the two drugs has not yet been determined. In this study we evaluated the activity and toxicity of a weekly gemcitabine and cisplatin schedule. Patients and methods: Thirty-six untreated patients with stage IIIB-IV NSCLC entered the study. Treatment consisted of gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 i.v. and cisplatin 35 mg/m2 i.v., both given weekly on days 1,8, and 15, followed by one week of rest. Results: Ninety-seven courses (273 weekly administrations) were delivered. The median dose-intensity was 612 mg/m2 per week for gemcitabine (82%) and 21 mg/m2 per week for cisplatin (80%). All 36 of the patients were evaluable for toxicity, and 30 for response. Partial remissions were observed in 12 patients, for an overall response rate of 40% (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 22.5%–57.5%). Most of the partial remissions were seen in IIIB patients (54% of the stage IIIB and 22% of the stage IV patients responded). According to the intent-to-treat principle, the response rate was 33.3% (12 of 36 patients). The median response duration was 9.9 months (range 4ndash;23) and the median survival time 11.8 months (range 1–24). World Health Organization (WHO) grade 3–4 myelotoxicity was: thrombocytopenia in nine patients (25%), neutropenia in six (16.6%) and anemia in six (16.6%); there was very little additional major toxicity. Conclusions: This regimen appears to be active and to have a favourable toxicity profile.
Bibliography:Correspondence to: Professor Riccardo Cellerino, MD, Clinica di Oncologia Medica, Universita di Ancona, Ospedale Torrette, 60020 Ancona, Italy
ArticleID:10.2.217
istex:F89A669AF39D9194C4D589FCAC7750C13E48BA5C
ark:/67375/HXZ-0064MG5B-D
ISSN:0923-7534
1569-8041
DOI:10.1023/A:1008323604269