The contribution of strain patterns in characterization of prostate peripheral zone lesions at transrectal ultrasonography

Elasticity is an important characteristic of tissue. During an elastography examination, various strain images of lesions are observed, and a suitable classification of strain patterns (SP) may provide vital diagnostic information about lesions. Numerous studies have shown that ultrasound elastograp...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inActa radiologica (1987) Vol. 53; no. 1; p. 119
Main Authors Zhang, Yan, Tang, Jie, Li, Yan-mi, Fei, Xiang, He, En-hui, Li, Qiu-yang, Shi, Huai-yin
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England 01.02.2012
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Elasticity is an important characteristic of tissue. During an elastography examination, various strain images of lesions are observed, and a suitable classification of strain patterns (SP) may provide vital diagnostic information about lesions. Numerous studies have shown that ultrasound elastography can improve the detection of prostate cancer, but the diagnostic value of SP classification has not yet been fully evaluated. To investigate the contribution of SP on the characterization of prostate peripheral zone lesions by transrectal real-time tissue elastography (TRTE) in combination with conventional transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS). One hundred and seventy-one patients with suspected prostate cancer underwent TRUS and TRTE examinations. The SPs of the suspicious lesions were classified into five scores by TRTE according to the degree and distribution of strain. All findings were confirmed by transrectal systematic 12-core biopsies and targeted biopsies for suspicious areas detecting by TRUS and/or TRTE. One hundred and forty-eight of 171 patients had high-quality TRTE imaging and were included into the study. When a cut-off point of SP score III was used, the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) was, respectively, 0.75 (95% CI: 0.67-0.83), 0.85 (95% CI: 0.78-0.91) and 0.84 (95% CI: 0.77-0.91) for the diagnosis of prostate cancer by TRUS, TRTE and TRTE + TRUS. A linear tendency of SP and Gleason scores was observed in scores III-V. The detection rate of prostate cancer using TRTE-targeted biopsy (75.8%) was significantly higher than that of systematic 12-core biopsy plus TRUS-targeted biopsy (14.5%) (P = 0.00). This study suggests the significant contribution of SP on characterization of prostate peripheral zone lesions and the improvement of TRTE-targeted biopsy on detection of prostate cancer.
ISSN:1600-0455
DOI:10.1258/ar.2011.110504