Microfinance Facility for Rural Women Entrepreneurs in Pakistan: An Empirical Analysis

• Published in: Agriculture (Basel) Vol. 10; no. 3; p. 54
• Main Authors: Khan, Touseef Ahmed, Khan, Fahem Ahmed, Violinda, Qristin, Aasir, Ilyas, Jian, Sun
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: MDPI AG 01.03.2020
• Subjects: difference-in-difference; female rural entrepreneurs; household welfare; microfinance; rural pakistan; women’s empowerment
• ISSN: 2077-0472; 2077-0472
• DOI: 10.3390/agriculture10030054

Since 1990, microfinance has gained universal recognition as an essential and useful tool to address the economically productive poor and provide them with a way to come out of the vicious circle of poverty, by delivering loans and credit on flexible terms in contrast to commercial banks. Many studies from different parts of the world have shown significant economic and social uplift of recipients (both men and women) of microfinance programs. However, in recent years, some studies argue against the positive influence of microfinance and stresses that microfinance is commercialized, and it has become more of a profit generation activity than uplifting of the economically productive poor, which is one of many core objective of microfinance organizations. Many empirical studies have been done to know the effects of microfinance on the welfare of households. They are well documented, e.g., in Bangladesh and India, but only a few studies assess the microfinance effect on rural female entrepreneurs of Pakistan. The present study was carried out to empirically analyze the outcome of microfinance on Pakistan’s female entrepreneurs. Women’s empowerment is gauged using income and consumption as welfare indicators. The difference in difference method is applied to investigate the effects of microfinance on its recipients, which is considered a useful tool to tackle the selection bias problem. Our study result shows that microfinance programs that target women not just only increase income and consumption of female borrowers, making them financially stable, but in fact, many local stakeholders also get benefited from it, and in turn, it creates opportunities for the whole local community. However, our results also show that it does not reach to the poorest of poor women (extremely poor) and thus does not serve the purpose of many of its core objectives, i.e., poverty reduction of extremely poor and henceforth should not be relied upon in this perspective.