Subjective and objective nasal obstruction assessment in children with chronic rhinitis

The present study was undertaken, to test the hypothesis that schoolchildren on long-term treatment for chronic rhinitis under-report their nasal congestion. Ninety-seven children aged 8.3–15.5 years (median 12.7) with non-purulent perennial rhinitis, for 1.4–8.5 years (median 2.8) self-graded their...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology Vol. 70; no. 3; pp. 501 - 505
Main Authors Priftis, Kostas N., Drigopoulos, Kostas, Sakalidou, Afrodite, Triga, Maria, Kallis, Vasilis, Nicolaidou, Polyxeni
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Ireland Elsevier Ireland Ltd 01.03.2006
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The present study was undertaken, to test the hypothesis that schoolchildren on long-term treatment for chronic rhinitis under-report their nasal congestion. Ninety-seven children aged 8.3–15.5 years (median 12.7) with non-purulent perennial rhinitis, for 1.4–8.5 years (median 2.8) self-graded their nasal blockage as “severe” (group-A), “moderate” (group-B), “mild” (group-C) or “absent” (group-D). An additional 48 normal children served as controls (group-E). Subsequently active anterior rhinomanometry for total nasal airway resistance (TNAR) measurement and decongestion test (>20% TNAR fall) were employed as objective means of nasal congestion. Mean pre-decongestion TNAR values did not show any significant difference between the group-A, -B and -C; significant differences were observed between group-A and -D ( p = 0.04) and between all groups as compared to -E. Positive decongestion test was detected in 57.1%, 53.8%, 48.3%, 32.3% and 10.4% of children in group-A, -B, -C, -D and -E, respectively (group-A, -B, -C versus -E p < 0.001, group-D versus -E p = 0.03). Schoolchildren on long-term treatment for perennial rhinitis frequently under-report their symptom of nasal stuffiness.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0165-5876
1872-8464
DOI:10.1016/j.ijporl.2005.07.027