Early patient outcomes after primary and revision total knee arthroplasty: A prospective study

There has been speculation as to how the outcome of revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) compares with that of primary TKA. We have collected data prospectively from patients operated on by one surgeon using one prosthesis in each group. One hundred patients underwent primary TKA and 60 revision T...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of bone and joint surgery. British volume Vol. 84; no. 7; pp. 994 - 999
Main Authors HARTLEY, R. C, BARTON-HANSON, N. G, FINLEY, R, PARKINSON, R. W
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery 01.09.2002
British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery
EditionBritish volume
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:There has been speculation as to how the outcome of revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) compares with that of primary TKA. We have collected data prospectively from patients operated on by one surgeon using one prosthesis in each group. One hundred patients underwent primary TKA and 60 revision TKA. They completed SF-12 and WOMAC questionnaires before and at six and 12 months after operation. The improvements in the SF-12 physical scores and WOMAC pain, stiffness and function scores in both primary and revision TKA patients were highly statistically significant at six months. There was no statistically significant difference in the size of the improvement in the SF-12 physical and WOMAC pain, stiffness and function scores between the primary and revision patients at six months after surgery. The SF-12 mental scores of patients in both groups showed no statistically significant difference after surgery at the six- and 12-month assessments. Our findings show that primary and revision TKA lead to a comparable improvement in patient-perceived outcomes of physical variables in both generic and disease-specific health measures at follow-up at one year.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0301-620X
2049-4394
2044-5377
2049-4408
DOI:10.1302/0301-620X.84B7.12607