Regionalization of a national integrated energy system model: A case study of the northern Netherlands

•Primary and secondary energy mixes at regional and national scales vary greatly.•Some regional building types and industrial activities potentially save energy.•Interregional secondary energy flows, notably hydrogen, are massive.•System costs and energy infrastructure investments differ vastly acro...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inApplied energy Vol. 306; p. 118035
Main Authors Sahoo, Somadutta, van Stralen, Joost N.P., Zuidema, Christian, Sijm, Jos, Yamu, Claudia, Faaij, André
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Ltd 15.01.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•Primary and secondary energy mixes at regional and national scales vary greatly.•Some regional building types and industrial activities potentially save energy.•Interregional secondary energy flows, notably hydrogen, are massive.•System costs and energy infrastructure investments differ vastly across regions. Integrated energy system modeling tools predominantly focus on the (inter)national or local scales. The intermediate level is important from the perspective of regional policy making, particularly for identifying the potentials and constraints of various renewable resources. Additionally, distribution variations of economic and social sectors, such as housing, agriculture, industries, and energy infrastructure, foster regional energy demand differences. We used an existing optimization-based national integrated energy system model, Options Portfolio for Emission Reduction Assessment or OPERA, for our analysis. The modeling framework was subdivided into four major blocks: the economic structure, the built environment and industries, renewable energy potentials, and energy infrastructure, including district heating. Our scenario emphasized extensive use of intermittent renewables to achieve low greenhouse gas emissions. Our multi-node, regionalized model revealed the significant impacts of spatial parameters on the outputs of different technology options. Our case study was the northern region of the Netherlands. The region generated a significant amount of hydrogen (H2) from offshore wind, i.e. 620 Peta Joule (PJ), and transmitted a substantial volume of H2 (390 PJ) to the rest of the Netherlands. Additionally, the total renewable share in the primary energy mix of almost every northern region is ∼90% or more compared to ∼70% for the rest of the Netherlands. The results confirm the added value of regionalized modeling from the perspective of regional policy making as opposed to relying solely on national energy system models. Furthermore, we suggest that the regionalization of national models is an appropriate method to analyze regional energy systems.
ISSN:0306-2619
1872-9118
DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.118035