On the inelastic seismic response of asymmetric buildings under bi-axial excitation

• Published in: Earthquake engineering & structural dynamics Vol. 34; no. 8; pp. 943 - 963
• Main Authors: Marus̆ić, Damjan, Fajfar, Peter
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Chichester, UK John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 10.07.2005; Wiley
• Subjects: asymmetric buildings; bi-axial eccentricity; bi-directional ground motion; Earth sciences; Earth, ocean, space; Earthquakes, seismology; Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics; Engineering geology; Exact sciences and technology; inelastic response; Internal geophysics; seismic response; torsion; steel; bi-axial eccentricity; mathematical models; eccentricity; ground motion; stiffness; earthquakes; bi-directional ground motion; seismic response; torsion; buildings; plastic deformation; displacements; asymmetric buildings; dispersion; earthquake engineering; inelastic response; direction
• ISSN: 0098-8847; 1096-9845
• DOI: 10.1002/eqe.463

The elastic and inelastic seismic response of plan‐asymmetric regular multi‐storey steel‐frame buildings has been investigated under bi‐directional horizontal ground motions. Symmetric variants of these buildings were designed according to Eurocodes 3 and 8. Asymmetric buildings were created by assuming a mass eccentricity in each of the two principal directions. The torsional response in the elastic and inelastic range is qualitatively similar with the exception of the stiff edge in the strong direction of torsionally stiff buildings and the stiff edge in the weak direction of torsionally flexible buildings. The response is influenced by the intensity of ground motion, i.e. by the magnitude of plastic deformation. In the limiting case of very strong ground motion, the behaviour of initially torsionally stiff and initially torsionally flexible buildings may become qualitatively similar. A decrease in stiffness due to plastic deformations in one direction may substantially influence the behaviour in the orthogonal direction. The response strongly depends on the detailed characteristics of the ground motion. On average, torsional effects are reduced with increasing plastic deformations, unless the plastic deformations are small. Taking into account also the dispersion of results which is generally larger in the inelastic range than in the elastic one, it can be concluded that (a) the amplification of displacements determined by the elastic analysis can be used as a rough estimate also in the inelastic range and (b) any favourable torsional effect on the stiff side of torsionally stiff buildings, which may arise from elastic analysis, may disappear in the inelastic range. The conclusions are limited to fairly regular buildings and subject to further investigations. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.