What kind of impacts can artwork have on viewers? Establishing a taxonomy for aesthetic impacts

• Published in: The British journal of psychology Vol. 114; no. 2; pp. 335 - 351
• Main Authors: Christensen, Alexander P., Cardillo, Eileen R., Chatterjee, Anjan
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England British Psychological Society 01.05.2023
• Subjects: Academic disciplines; aesthetic cognitivism; Aesthetics; affect; Art history; Classification; cognition; Emotions - physiology; Esthetics; Humans; Neurosciences; Psychology; Psychometrics; semantic network; Taxonomy; Theology; Viewers; semantic network; cognition; aesthetic cognitivism; affect
• ISSN: 0007-1269; 2044-8295
• DOI: 10.1111/bjop.12623

What kinds of impacts can visual art have on a viewer? To identify potential art impacts, we recruited five aesthetics experts from different academic disciplines: art history, neuroscience, philosophy, psychology and theology. Together, the group curated a set of terms that corresponded to descriptive features (124 terms) and cognitive‐affective impacts (69 terms) of artworks. Using these terms as prompts, participants (n = 899) were given one minute to generate words for each term related to how an artwork looked (descriptive features) or made them think or feel (cognitive‐affective impacts). Using network psychometric approaches, we identified terms that were semantically similar based on participants' responses and applied hierarchical exploratory graph analysis to map the relationships between the terms. Our analyses identified 17 descriptive dimensions, which could be further reduced to 5, and 11 impact dimensions, which could be further reduced to 4. The resulting taxonomy demonstrated overlap between the descriptive and impact networks as well as consistency with empirical evidence. This taxonomy could serve as the foundation to empirically evaluate art's impacts on viewers.