Effectiveness, safety and utilization of vismodegib in locally advanced basal cell carcinoma under real‐world conditions in Germany – The non‐interventional study NIELS
Background Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) can arise by the uncontrolled proliferation of cells from multiple epidermal compartments due to aberrant activation of the Hedgehog (Hh) signalling pathway. Vismodegib, a small‐molecule inhibitor of this pathway, is approved for treatment of patients with local...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology Vol. 35; no. 8; pp. 1678 - 1685 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
01.08.2021
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Background
Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) can arise by the uncontrolled proliferation of cells from multiple epidermal compartments due to aberrant activation of the Hedgehog (Hh) signalling pathway. Vismodegib, a small‐molecule inhibitor of this pathway, is approved for treatment of patients with locally advanced (la) BCC inappropriate for surgery or radiotherapy or patients with symptomatic metastatic (m) BCC.
Objectives
The aim of this non‐interventional study was to assess effectiveness with a special focus on duration of response (DOR), safety and utilization of vismodegib for treatment of laBCC in daily practice in Germany.
Methods
This non‐interventional study (NIS) observed treatment of laBCC with vismodegib according to the German label in clinical practice. All available patients who had received at least one dose of vismodegib between commercial availability of vismodegib in Germany (02 August 2013) and 3 years before end of study (31 March 2016) could be included and were documented retrospectively and/or prospectively for up to 3 years. Primary effectiveness variable was DOR. Assessment of tumour response was carried out by the treating physicians. Exploratory variables included utilization of vismodegib, decision makers for therapy and method of tumour response evaluation. All statistical analyses were descriptive.
Results
Between September 2015 and March 2019, 66 patients were observed at 26 German centres. The objective response rate (ORR) was 74.2% and the disease control rate (DCR) was 90.9%. The median DOR was 15.9 months (95% CI: 9.2; 25.7; n = 49 patients with response). The median progression‐free survival (PFS) was 19.1 months and the median time to response (TTR) 2.7 months. A total of 340 adverse events were reported in 63 (95.5%) patients; no new safety signals were identified.
Conclusions
The NIS NIELS shows effectiveness and safety of vismodegib in patients with laBCC. It confirms the transferability of the results of the pivotal trial into routine clinical practice. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Funding sources During the conduct of the study RG, H‐JS, AH, UL, FM, SH, CU, RUW, CB, RH, and DS received investigator fees from Roche Pharma AG, and MH was an employee of Roche Pharma AG. Outside the submitted work: RG reports grants, personal fees and non‐financial support from Amgen, Novartis; personal fees and non‐financial support from Roche, BMS, Merck Serono, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi Regeneron; grants and personal fees from Pfizer; personal fees from MSD, Almirall Hermal, Sun Pharma, 4SC, Bayer; and grants from Johnson & Johnson. AH reports grants and personal fees from Amgen, BMS, Eisai, Immunocore, Merck and Pfizer, MSD, Novartis, Philogen, Pierre Fabre, Regeneron, Replimune, Roche, Sanofi‐Genzyme, Seagen. UL reports personal fees from Roche, Sun Pharma. SH reports grants and personal fees from BMS; and personal fees from Novartis, Pierre Fabre, MSD. CB reports personal fees from BMS, Immunocore, InflaX, Roche, Sun Pharma, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Leo Pharma, Almirall Hermal, Regeneron, Sanofi. RH reports personal fees from BMS, Novartis, Roche, Sun Pharma. MH is an employee of Roche Pharma AG, Grenzach‐Wyhlen, Germany. DS reports grants, personal fees, non‐financial support and other from Novartis, BMS; personal fees, non‐financial support and other from Merck/MSD; personal fees and non‐financial support from Merck Serono, Amgen; personal fees and other from 4SC, Sanofi/Regeneron, Philogen, Regeneron; and personal fees from Immunocore, Incyte, Pierre Fabre, Mologen, Array BioPharma, InFlarX, Sandoz/Hexal, Neracare. This study was funded by Roche Pharma AG, Grenzach‐Wyhlen, Germany. Roche was involved in design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis and interpretation of data; and preparation, review and approval of the manuscript. Conflict of interest ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0926-9959 1468-3083 |
DOI: | 10.1111/jdv.17332 |