Skeletal stability in patients with clefts after large maxillary advancements using intraoral distraction

• Published in: British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery Vol. 58; no. 6; pp. 663 - 668
• Main Authors: Rachmiel, A., Turgeman, S., Shilo, D., Aizenbud, D., Emodi, O.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Scotland Elsevier Ltd 01.07.2020
• Subjects: Cephalometry; Cleft Lip; Cleft Palate; Dentistry; distraction osteogenesis; Humans; Malocclusion, Angle Class III; Maxilla; maxillary hypoplasia; Osteogenesis, Distraction; Osteotomy, Le Fort; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; maxillary hypoplasia; cleft palate; distraction osteogenesis
• ISSN: 0266-4356; 1532-1940
• DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.03.023

Maxillary hypoplasia is a common outcome in patients with cleft lip and palate after surgical and orthodontic interventions, and maxillary distraction osteogenesis has become a useful procedure for patients with extensive maxillary deformities. The aim of this study was to evaluate long term (two years) stability after maxillary advancement of more than 10mm by distraction osteogenesis in cleft patients using internal devices. We organised a retrospective study on 42 patients with cleft lip and palate using cephalometric analysis before and after maxillary distraction osteogenesis and evaluated them for 24 months. Postoperative measurements showed a marked advancement with an increase of 13.3mm and 10.8° in the length of the maxilla (Co-A) and SNA, respectively, including a shift from Angle class III to class I in dental relations. Follow-up observations showed preservation of maxillary length with a relapse of only 6.0 % (mean (SD) 0.8 (0.7) mm) and 10% relapse in SNA angle (mean (SD)1.1 (1.4) °) one year postoperatively and a negligible regression at the two years’ follow up. This large-scale study shows stable results of skeletal advancement using distraction osteogenesis, indicating safe and reliable outcomes among patients with cleft lip and palate.