Glatiramer acetate‐specific T‐helper 1‐ and 2‐type cell lines produce BDNF: implications for multiple sclerosis therapy

The clinical effects of glatiramer acetate (GA), an approved therapy for multiple sclerosis, are thought to be largely mediated by a T‐helper 1 (TH1) to T‐helper 2 (TH2) shift of GA‐reactive T‐lymphocytes. Current theories propose that activated GA‐reactive TH2 cells penetrate the CNS, release anti‐...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBrain (London, England : 1878) Vol. 125; no. 11; pp. 2381 - 2391
Main Authors Ziemssen, Tjalf, Kümpfel, Tania, Klinkert, Wolfgang E. F., Neuhaus, Oliver, Hohlfeld, Reinhard
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Oxford University Press 01.11.2002
Oxford Publishing Limited (England)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0006-8950
1460-2156
1460-2156
DOI10.1093/brain/awf252

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The clinical effects of glatiramer acetate (GA), an approved therapy for multiple sclerosis, are thought to be largely mediated by a T‐helper 1 (TH1) to T‐helper 2 (TH2) shift of GA‐reactive T‐lymphocytes. Current theories propose that activated GA‐reactive TH2 cells penetrate the CNS, release anti‐inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin (IL)‐4, IL‐5 and IL‐10, and thus inhibit neighbouring inflammatory cells by a mechanism termed ‘bystander suppression’. We demonstrate that both GA‐specific TH2 and TH1 cells produce the neurotrophin brain‐derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF). As the signal‐transducing receptor for BDNF, the full‐length 145 tyrosine kinase receptor (trk) B, is expressed in multiple sclerosis lesions, it is likely that the BDNF secreted by GA‐reactive TH2 and TH1 has neurotrophic effects in the multiple sclerosis target tissue. This may be an additional mechanism of action of GA, and may be relevant for therapies with altered peptide ligands in general. To demonstrate that GA‐reactive T cells produce BDNF, we selected four GA‐specific, long‐term T‐cell lines (TCLs), which were characterized according to their cytokine profile by intracellular double‐fluorescence flow cytometry. Three TCLs (isolated from a normal subject) had the phenotypes TH1, TH1/TH0, and TH0; the fourth, derived from a GA‐treated patient, had the phenotype TH2. To demonstrate BDNF production, we used a combination of RT‐PCR (reverse transcription‐polymerase chain reaction) and two specially designed techniques for BDNF protein detection: one was based on ELISA (enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay) of supernatants from co‐cultures of GA‐specific TCLs plus GA‐pulsed antigen‐presenting cells, and the other on the direct intracellular staining of BDNF in individual T cells and flow cytometric analysis. The different assays and different TCLs yielded similar, consistent results. All four GA‐specific T‐cell lines, representing the major different TH phenotypes, could be stimulated to produce BDNF.
Bibliography:Correspondence to: Dr R. Hohlfeld, Institute for Clinical Neuroimmunology, Klinikum Grosshadern, Ludwig Maximilians University, Marchioninistrasse 15, D‐81366 Munich, Germany E‐mail: hohlfeld@neuro.mpg.de
ark:/67375/HXZ-MW2N0WLW-F
local:awf252
istex:C24D19BA9321E1CBDB6434438C6307AF70E4C09F
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:0006-8950
1460-2156
1460-2156
DOI:10.1093/brain/awf252