Making the Most of Mealtimes (M3): Association Between Relationship-Centered Care Practices, and Number of Staff and Residents at Mealtimes in Canadian Long-Term Care Homes

To determine if (1) number of staff or residents, when considering home-level factors and presence of family/volunteers, are associated with relationship-centered care practices at mealtimes in general and dementia care units in long-term care (LTC); and (2) the association between number of staff a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of the American Medical Directors Association Vol. 22; no. 9; p. 1927
Main Authors Trinca, Vanessa, Chaudhury, Habib, Slaughter, Susan E, Lengyel, Christina, Carrier, Natalie, Keller, Heather
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.09.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To determine if (1) number of staff or residents, when considering home-level factors and presence of family/volunteers, are associated with relationship-centered care practices at mealtimes in general and dementia care units in long-term care (LTC); and (2) the association between number of staff and relationship-centered care is moderated by number of residents and family/volunteers, profit status or chain affiliation. Secondary analysis of the Making the Most of Mealtimes (M3) cross-sectional multisite study. Thirty-two Canadian LTC homes (Alberta, Manitoba, Ontario, and New Brunswick) and 639 residents were recruited. Eighty-two units were included, with 58 being general and 24 being dementia care units. Trained research coordinators completed the Mealtime Scan (MTS) for LTC at 4 to 6 mealtimes in each unit to determine number of staff, residents, and family or volunteers present. Relationship-centered care was assessed using the Mealtime Relational Care Checklist. The director of care or food services manager completed a home survey describing home sector and chain affiliation. Multivariable analyses were stratified by type of unit. In general care units, the number of residents was negatively (P = .009), and number of staff positively (P < .001) associated with relationship-centered care (F  = 5.48, P < .001). For dementia care units, the associations were nonsignificant (F  = 2.74, P = .05). The association between staffing and relationship-centered care was not moderated by any variables in either general or dementia care units. Number of staff in general care units may increase relationship-centered care at mealtimes in LTC. Number of residents or staff did not significantly affect relationship-centered care in dementia care units, suggesting that other factors such as additional training may better explain relationship-centered care in these units. Mandating minimum staffing and additional training at the federal level should be considered to ensure that staff have the capacity to deliver relationship-centered care at mealtimes, which is considered a best practice.
ISSN:1538-9375
DOI:10.1016/j.jamda.2020.11.020