Comparison of Static and Dynamic Printed Organic Shift Registers

Dynamic and static shift-register circuits are fabricated with an inkjet process for printing complementary organic semiconductors. The static design is based on edge-triggered master-slave flip-flops, and the dynamic design is based on a true-single-phase-clock architecture. The merits and drawback...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inIEEE electron device letters Vol. 34; no. 2; pp. 271 - 273
Main Authors Schwartz, D. E., Tse Nga Ng
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, NY IEEE 01.02.2013
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
Subjects
Applied sciences
Circuit properties
Clocks
Complementary logic
Digital circuits
dynamic circuit design
Electric, optical and optoelectronic circuits
Electronic circuits
Electronics
Exact sciences and technology
Fabrication
inkjet printing
Integrated circuit modeling
Organic thin film transistors
organic thin-film transistor (OTFT)
Semiconductor electronics. Microelectronics. Optoelectronics. Solid state devices
shift register
Shift registers
Transistors
Complementary logic
Circuit design
Dynamic circuit
inkjet printing
Clock
Sequential circuit
Shift register
Flip-flop circuits
Trigger
Organic semiconductors
organic thin-film transistor (OTFT)
Thin film transistor
dynamic circuit design
Ink jet printing
Comparative study
Organic electronics
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Dynamic and static shift-register circuits are fabricated with an inkjet process for printing complementary organic semiconductors. The static design is based on edge-triggered master-slave flip-flops, and the dynamic design is based on a true-single-phase-clock architecture. The merits and drawbacks of the two approaches are considered and compared.
ISSN:0741-3106
1558-0563
DOI:10.1109/LED.2012.2233709