The profile of the spinal column in subjects with lumbar developmental spinal stenosis

• Published in: The bone & joint journal Vol. 103-B; no. 4; pp. 725 - 733
• Main Authors: Lai, Marcus Kin Long, Cheung, Prudence Wing Hang, Samartzis, Dino, Karppinen, Jaro, Cheung, Kenneth M. C., Cheung, Jason Pui Yin
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England 01.04.2021
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cross-Sectional Studies; Female; Humans; Intervertebral Disc Degeneration - diagnostic imaging; Lumbar Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods; Male; Middle Aged; Spinal Canal - diagnostic imaging; Spinal Stenosis - diagnostic imaging; Developmental spinal stenosis; Degenerative; Lumbar; MRI; Spine
• ISSN: 2049-4394; 2049-4408; 2049-4408
• DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B4.BJJ-2020-1792.R1

The aim of this study was to determine the differences in spinal imaging characteristics between subjects with or without lumbar developmental spinal stenosis (DSS) in a population-based cohort. This was a radiological analysis of 2,387 participants who underwent L1-S1 MRI. Means and ranges were calculated for age, sex, BMI, and MRI measurements. Anteroposterior (AP) vertebral canal diameters were used to differentiate those with DSS from controls. Other imaging parameters included vertebral body dimensions, spinal canal dimensions, disc degeneration scores, and facet joint orientation. Mann-Whitney U and chi-squared tests were conducted to search for measurement differences between those with DSS and controls. In order to identify possible associations between DSS and MRI parameters, those who were statistically significant in the univariate binary logistic regression were included in a multivariate stepwise logistic regression after adjusting for demographics. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported where appropriate. Axial AP vertebral canal diameter (p < 0.001), interpedicular distance (p < 0.001), AP dural sac diameter (p < 0.001), lamina angle (p < 0.001), and sagittal mid-vertebral body height (p < 0.001) were significantly different between those identified as having DSS and controls. Narrower interpedicular distance (OR 0.745 (95% CI 0.618 to 0.900); p = 0.002) and AP dural sac diameter (OR 0.506 (95% CI 0.400 to 0.641); p < 0.001) were associated with DSS. Lamina angle (OR 1.127 (95% CI 1.045 to 1.214); p = 0.002) and right facet joint angulation (OR 0.022 (95% CI 0.002 to 0.247); p = 0.002) were also associated with DSS. No association was observed between disc parameters and DSS. From this large-scale cohort, the canal size is found to be independent of body stature. Other than spinal canal dimensions, abnormal orientations of lamina angle and facet joint angulation may also be a result of developmental variations, leading to increased likelihood of DSS. Other skeletal parameters are spared. There was no relationship between DSS and soft tissue changes of the spinal column, which suggests that DSS is a unique result of bony maldevelopment. These findings require validation in other ethnicities and populations. Level of Evidence: I (diagnostic study) Cite this article:  2021;103-B(4):725-733.