Nonlinear stress-dependent recovery behavior of the intervertebral disc

• Published in: Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials Vol. 110; p. 103881
• Main Authors: Bezci, Semih E., Lim, Shiyin, O'Connell, Grace D.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Netherlands Elsevier Ltd 01.10.2020
• Subjects: Fluid flow; Intervertebral Disc; Lumbar Vertebrae; Motion; Nonlinear viscoelasticity; Pressure; Recovery mechanics; Viscosity; Weight-Bearing; Recovery mechanics; Intervertebral disc; Fluid flow; Nonlinear viscoelasticity
• ISSN: 1751-6161; 1878-0180; 1878-0180
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103881

The intervertebral disc exhibits complex mechanics due to its heterogeneous structure, inherent viscoelasticity, and interstitial fluid-matrix interactions. Sufficient fluid flow into the disc during low loading periods is important for maintaining mechanics and nutrient transport. However, there is a lack of knowledge on the effect of loading magnitude on time-dependent recovery behavior and the relative contribution of multiple recovery mechanisms during recovery. In most studies that have evaluated disc recovery behavior, a single load condition has been considered, making it difficult to compare findings across studies. Hence, the objective of this study was to quantify unloaded disc recovery behavior after compressive creep loading under a wide range of physiologically relevant stresses (0.2–2 MPa). First, the repeatability of disc recovery behavior was assessed. Once repeatable recovery behavior was confirmed, each motion segment was subject to three cycles of creep-recovery loading, where each cycle consisted of a 24-h creep at a pre-assigned load (100, 200, 300, 600, 900, or 1200 N), followed by an 18-h recovery period at a nominal load (10 N). Results showed that disc recovery behavior was strongly influenced by the magnitude of loading. The magnitude of instantaneous and time-dependent recovery deformations increased nonlinearly with an increase in compressive stress during creep. In conclusion, this study highlights that elastic deformation, intrinsic viscoelasticity, and poroelasticity all have substantial contributions to disc height recovery during low loading periods. However, their relative contributions to disc height recovery largely depend on the magnitude of loading. While loading history does not influence the contribution of the short-term recovery, the contribution of long-term recovery is highly sensitive to loading magnitude.