Use of patient-reported outcome measures in oral and maxillofacial trauma surgery: a review

• Published in: British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery Vol. 56; no. 5; pp. 371 - 379
• Main Authors: Ologunde, R., McLeod, N.M.H.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Scotland Elsevier Ltd 01.06.2018
• Subjects: Dentistry; maxillofacial; PROM; surgery; trauma; trauma; PROM; maxillofacial; surgery
• ISSN: 0266-4356; 1532-1940
• DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2018.03.010

In the UK, about one person/100/year sustains a facial injury, so trauma surgery accounts for a considerable part of the caseload in oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS). Patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) allow for patient-centred assessment of postoperative outcomes, but to our knowledge, most research in OMFS trauma does not currently include them. To investigate their use, we searched Medline to find relevant studies that reported outcomes from inception in January 1879 to August 2016. Those not in the English language and those that did not report operations were excluded. We retrieved 416 articles, of which 21 met the inclusion criteria (five randomised controlled trials and 16 cohort studies) yielding 16 outcome measures. Most of these had been devised by authors (eight studies), four studies reported use of the Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index, and three the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation. Most were used in studies on mandibular surgery (n=13), followed by those on nasal and facial surgery (n=3 each). There is a great heterogeneity in the use of these assessments in OMF trauma. In view of their increasing importance compared with simpler objective measures that may not be relevant to the patients’ own perception, more research is needed to establish which of them can be used to measure the QoL of patients treated for OMF trauma.