Long-term follow-up of a randomized trial of fludarabine–mitoxantrone, compared with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vindesine, prednisone (CHVP), as first-line treatment of elderly patients with advanced, low-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma before the era of monoclonal antibodies
Background: This randomized study compared the efficacy and safety of fludarabine–mitoxantrone (FM) with mini-CHVP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vindesine, prednisone) in elderly patients with advanced, low-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Patients and methods: End points were remission rates [o...
Saved in:
Published in | Annals of oncology Vol. 16; no. 3; pp. 466 - 472 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Oxford
Oxford University Press
01.03.2005
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Background: This randomized study compared the efficacy and safety of fludarabine–mitoxantrone (FM) with mini-CHVP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vindesine, prednisone) in elderly patients with advanced, low-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Patients and methods: End points were remission rates [overall response (OR) and complete response (CR)], failure-free survival (FFS), survival and toxicity. One hundred and fifty-five patients were randomized, 144 were evaluable for safety and 142 for response. Each treatment arm was given as six monthly cycles, followed by three bimonthly cycles. FM comprised fludarabine (20 mg/m2 i.v.), days 1–5, plus mitoxantrone (10 mg/m2 i.v.), day 1. CHVP cycles comprised cyclophosphamide (750 mg/m2 i.v. infusion), doxorubicin (25 mg/m2 i.v.) and vindesine (3 mg/m2 i.v.) on day 1, and prednisone (50 mg/m2) on days 1–5. Results: FM therapy resulted in superior remission rates (OR 81% versus 64%, CR 49% versus 17%; P=0.0004). Median FFS for FM patients was 36 months, compared with 19 months for CHVP patients, and has not yet been reached for early CR patients at 53 months. Treatment arm was the major risk factor influencing survival. Both treatments were well tolerated, with only few infectious complications. Conclusion: FM was more effective than CHVP in achieving OR and CR, and favorably affected the outcome. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | istex:A7FCABC23F429A27CADF82F29C7FF96FADB3E07A Correspondence to: Dr E. Deconinck, Service d'Hématologie, CHU Besançon, 25 030 Besançon Cedex, France. Tel: +33-3-81-66-82-32; Fax: +33-3-81-66-82-15; Email: edeconinck@chu-besancon.fr href:mdi091.pdf ark:/67375/HXZ-S82CBHZ6-1 local:mdi091 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0923-7534 1569-8041 |
DOI: | 10.1093/annonc/mdi091 |