Effect of alternatively designed hospital birthing rooms on the rate of vaginal births: Multicentre randomised controlled trial Be-Up

• Published in: Women and birth : journal of the Australian College of Midwives Vol. 36; no. 5; pp. 429 - 438
• Main Authors: Ayerle, Gertrud M., Mattern, Elke, Striebich, Sabine, Oganowski, Theresa, Ocker, Ronja, Haastert, Burkhard, Schäfers, Rainhild, Seliger, Gregor
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Netherlands Elsevier Ltd 01.09.2023
• Subjects: BE-UP; Birth environment; Midwifery care; RCT study; Upright position; Vaginal birth; Upright position; Vaginal birth; Midwifery care; Birth environment; BE-UP; RCT study
• ISSN: 1871-5192; 1878-1799
• DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2023.02.009

There is limited research into the effects of the birth environment on birth outcomes. To investigate the effect of a hospital birthing room designed to encourage mobility, self-determination and uptake of upright maternal positions in labour on the rate of vaginal births. The multicentre randomised controlled trial Be-Up, conducted from April 2018 to May 2021 in 22 hospitals in Germany, included 3719 pregnant women with a singleton pregnancy in cephalic position at term. In the intervention birthing room, the bed was removed or covered in a corner of the room and materials were provided to promote upright maternal positions, physical mobility and self-determination. No changes were made in the control birthing room. The primary outcome was probability of vaginal births; secondary outcomes were episiotomy, perineal tears degree 3 and 4, epidural anaesthesia, “critical outcome of newborns at term”, and maternal self-determination (LAS). Analysis: intention-to-treat. The rate of vaginal births was 89.1 % (95 % CI 87.5–90.4%; n = 1836) in the intervention group and 88.5 % (95 % CI 87.0–89.9 %; n = 1863) in the control group. The risk difference in the probability of vaginal birth was + 0.54 % (95 % CI − 1.49 % to 2.57 %), the odds ratio was 1.06 (95 % CI 0.86–1.30). Neither the secondary endpoints nor serious adverse events showed significant differences. Regardless of group assignment, there was a significant association between upright maternal body position and maternal self-determination. The increased vaginal birth rates in both comparison groups can be explained by the high motivation of the women and the staff.