Performance Appraisal Based on Employees Competence in Procurement Services Unit (Case of Area Semarang)
Human resources is a company or organization major capital that gives company high effectiveness values. Performance appraisal is an important aspect of an effective human resource management. Employee appraisal can help the company to determine the working conditions of its employee. Employee perfo...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of physics. Conference series Vol. 1175; no. 1; pp. 12194 - 12199 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Bristol
IOP Publishing
01.03.2019
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Human resources is a company or organization major capital that gives company high effectiveness values. Performance appraisal is an important aspect of an effective human resource management. Employee appraisal can help the company to determine the working conditions of its employee. Employee performance appraisal based on competency has not been assessing especially by procurement service unit in Semarang City's Government and Diponegoro University. Therefore, needs to be weighted criteria to determine employee performance appraisal assessment component which is more important or otherwise. There are 6 variables determined based on Spencer Competence. The purpose of this research is to get the weight criteria for competence with ANP method and get the employee's performance appraisal using rating scale. Analytic Network Process (ANP) is one method that can be used to measure the competency criteria weights involves the relationship between criteria. From the results of the ANP weighting obtained weight for Achievement and Implementation competency (0,1651), Helping and Human Services competency (0,3848), Leadership competency (0,0314), Managerial competency (0,0718), Cognitive competency (0,2982), and Personal Effectiveness competency (0,0487). Based on an assessment of 31 employers of procurement service unit showed that 11 employers have very high performance, 9 employees have high performance while the other 11 employees have adequate performance. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1742-6588 1742-6596 |
DOI: | 10.1088/1742-6596/1175/1/012194 |