Using a multi-gene approach to infer the complicated phylogeny and evolutionary history of lorises (Order Primates: Family Lorisidae)

• Published in: Molecular phylogenetics and evolution Vol. 127; pp. 556 - 567
• Main Authors: Munds, Rachel A., Titus, Chelsea L., Eggert, Lori S., Blomquist, Gregory E.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01.10.2018
• Subjects: Animals; Bayes Theorem; Biological Evolution; Cell Nucleus - genetics; Discordance; Eocene; Genes, Mitochondrial; Loris; Lorisidae - classification; Lorisidae - genetics; Miocene; Monophyly; Paraphyly; Phylogeny; Primates; Monophyly; Paraphyly; Discordance; Primates; Loris; Eocene; Miocene
• ISSN: 1055-7903; 1095-9513
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2018.05.025

[Display omitted] •A concatenated or complete taxa phylogeny reveal Lorisidae as monophyletic.•Single-gene trees are inconsistent and result in polytomy with the outgroup Galago.•The family Lorisidae is ancient with roots dating back ∼40million years. Extensive phylogenetic studies have found robust phylogenies are modeled by using a multi-gene approach and sampling from the majority of the taxa of interest. Yet, molecular studies focused on the lorises, a cryptic primate family, have often relied on one gene, or just mitochondrial DNA, and many were unable to include all four genera in the analyses, resulting in inconclusive phylogenies. Past phylogenetic loris studies resulted in lorises being monophyletic, paraphyletic, or an unresolvable trichotomy with the closely related galagos. The purpose of our study is to improve our understanding of loris phylogeny and evolutionary history by using a multi-gene approach. We used the mitochondrial genes cytochrome b, and cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1, along with a nuclear intron (recombination activating gene 2) and nuclear exon (the melanocortin 1 receptor). Maximum Likelihood and Bayesian phylogenetic analyses were conducted based on data from each locus, as well as on the concatenated sequences. The robust, concatenated results found lorises to be a monophyletic family (Lorisidae) (PP ≥ 0.99) with two distinct subfamilies: the African Perodictinae (PP ≥ 0.99) and the Asian Lorisinae (PP ≥ 0.99). Additionally, from these analyses all four genera were all recovered as monophyletic (PP ≥ 0.99). Some of our single-gene analyses recovered monophyly, but many had discordances, with some showing paraphyly or a deep-trichotomy. Bayesian partitioned analyses inferred the most recent common ancestors of lorises emerged ∼42 ± 6 million years ago (mya), the Asian Lorisinae separated ∼30 ± 9 mya, and Perodictinae arose ∼26 ± 10 mya. These times fit well with known historical tectonic shifts of the area, as well as with the sparse loris fossil record. Additionally, our results agree with previous multi-gene studies on Lorisidae which found lorises to be monophyletic and arising ∼40 mya (Perelman et al., 2011; Pozzi et al., 2014). By taking a multi-gene approach, we were able to recover a well-supported, monophyletic loris phylogeny and inferred the evolutionary history of this cryptic family.