Prediction of Carbon Price in EU-ETS Using a Geometric Brownian Motion Model and Its Application to Analyze the Economic Competitiveness of Carbon Capture and Storage

To achieve carbon neutrality, many countries and regions are making efforts to promote the commercialization of greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation technologies using emissions trading systems (ETSs). Accurate predictions of when the cost of GHG reduction technologies will become competitive below carbo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEnergies (Basel) Vol. 16; no. 17; p. 6333
Main Authors Lee, Gwang Goo, Ham, Sung-Won
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Basel MDPI AG 01.09.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To achieve carbon neutrality, many countries and regions are making efforts to promote the commercialization of greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation technologies using emissions trading systems (ETSs). Accurate predictions of when the cost of GHG reduction technologies will become competitive below carbon prices could be invaluable to engineers and policy makers. In this study, carbon price movement in the EU-ETS was analyzed using a geometric Brownian motion (GBM) model. Using daily price data for the last 10 years, it tested whether the price pattern of the latter three years could be predicted by applying the first seven years of data to the GBM model. The results showed that the GBM model could well predict the upper and lower bounds of the actual carbon price. Based on the acceptable predictability of the GBM model, simulations were performed using carbon price data over the last decade, showing that carbon prices would reach around 200 EUR/tCO2 by the start of 2026. This is higher than the cost of CO2 avoided evaluated from the costs of commercial-scale carbon capture facilities for coal-fired power plants. This means that carbon capture technologies in the coal-fired power sector could become economically competitive within the next several years.
ISSN:1996-1073
1996-1073
DOI:10.3390/en16176333